SEARCHING
Find out where the grant data comes from, and what years and philanthropies are included.
Information, tips and tricks for making your search more successful
Search
Grants – search grants based on their
stated purpose
Recipients – search all grants to
a particular recipient
Funders – search for organizations or
individuals that are funding grants
People – search for people who benefit
from grant funds
Website – search the website for specific
text
Advanced search – specifiy multiple
criteria
All-in-one search – search the website
and the database at the same time for specific text
MEDIA TRANSPARENCY
Sign-up for our newsletter
Only registered visitors are allowed to email content or post comments
Your help is essential to this website
|
AROUND THE WEB
Washington Post
November 27, 2001
Justices Say Colo. Firm Shifted Arguments
[Editor's note: This Supreme Court decision represents a clear reversal and loss for Mountain States Legal Foundation and its client, Adarand Constructors]
...The court first heard the Adarand case in 1995 and ruled, by a vote of 5 to 4, that racial distinctions in government programs must survive "strict scrutiny" by the federal courts. Such programs must be "narrowly tailored" to serve a "compelling government interest," the court said, and remanded the case to lower courts to decide whether the highway program at issue met that standard...
...The case dismissed today, Adarand v. Mineta, No. 00-860, evolved out of Adarand's appeal of a lower federal appeals court's subsequent ruling that the program, as amended by the Clinton administration after the 1995 case, could indeed pass "strict scrutiny..."
Read the story >
|
|