search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

RELATED LINKS

Internal Links

Profiles:

Salvation Army

Other internal:

Original MT Report Faithbased Watch

External Links

Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Catholic Charities website

Salvation Army website

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 23, 2005

Faith The Nation

The Bush Administration awarded $2 billion in grants to religious organizations in 2004. Is Team Bush setting up a National Endowment for Religion?

On March 1, President George W. Bush told the more than 250 religious Faith the Nationleaders attending the WhiteFaith the Nation House Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Leadership Conference at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Washington, DC, that he was committed to his faith-based initiative "despite congressional apathy and criticism from some that he hasn't done enough to push the agenda," the Scripps Howard News Service reported.

"What I want to know is, 'Are we helping increase the number of new groups, small groups, first-time appliers for federal money? Are we doing that? Are we getting beyond those great, courageous faith-based programs that have been providing help for a long period of time? Are we reaching beyond the Salvation Army (website) or the Catholic Charities (website), the fantastic pillars of the faith-based program?'" Bush said. "And the answer is, 'We are.'"

The president also told the group that seven federal agencies had given $2 billion to faith-based organizations in 2004 -- 10.3 percent of the total funding awarded through 151 programs and 17 program areas at the seven federal agencies. This figure was a substantial increase from the $1.17 billion awarded in 2003. "In one year," according to a White House Fact Sheet, "HHS, HUD, Justice, Labor, and Education saw a 20% increase in the number of grants to faith-based organizations with 334 more grants awarded, and a 14% increase in the amount awarded to faith-based organizations - an increase of $164 million."

According to an early March report by BP News -- a news service of the Southern Baptist Convention -- "The Department of Housing and Human Services alone saw an 88 percent increase in the number of awards to faith-based organizations since 2002 -- from 483 to 908."

Richard Land, the president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (website) and one of the early critics of the president's faith-based initiative four years ago, attended the conference and was one of about a dozen religious leaders who met with Bush at the hotel before the speech. "It was crystal clear to anyone in the room that this is a critical issue for the president and there is no more important domestic policy issue than the faith-based initiative, which will further empower the armies of compassion to help alleviate suffering and bring hope to those at the margins of American society," Land told Baptist Press.

Bush's remarks may have been at least in part designed to reassure his Christian evangelical base that he is still actively backing the faith-based initiative. In February, David Kuo, the former deputy director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, "charged that the plan is popular with religious leaders who are influential in elections. But Kuo said the White House has not been committed to ending the stalemate in Congress," the Guardian reported. (For more from Kuo, see "Please, Keep Faith".)

Faith in Job Training

Within 10 days of President Bush's first inauguration in 2000, he unveiled what was to be one of the cornerstones of his domestic policy agenda; the faith-based initiative. Unlike the very public debate that is going on over the privatization of Social Security, the president's faith-based initiative hasn't gotten nearly the play in the media. Yet despite Congress' failure to pass substantive faith-based legislation in the four years since the president created the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (website), Team Bush has been steadily advancing the ball, creating faith-based offices in at least 10 federal agencies, and issuing a slew of Executive Orders aimed at "leveling the playing field."

Two days after the president's meeting with religious leaders, the House of Representatives passed H.R.-27, the Job Training Improvement Act by a 220-200 vote. The bill "includes a provision rolling back existing civil rights protections and allowing 'faith-based' groups, for the first time, to engage in government-funded religious discrimination in jobs funded through the program," stated a pre-vote press release from Americans United for Separation of Church and State (website). An amendment to restore civil rights protections to the bill, introduced by Rep. Robert C. Scott (D-Val.), failed on a 239-186 vote.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act allows for religious organizations to take religion into account in their hiring practices, but the Act doesn't deal with that issue in cases of groups that receive federal money. "Receipt of federal funds should not be conditioned on a faith-based organization's giving up part of its religious identity and mission," read a statement from the White House.

Before the House vote on the Job Training Improvement Act, Tony Perkins, the president of the Washington, DC-based conservative lobbying group, the Family Research Council (website), weighed in with his support in the FRS's daily online newsletter, Tony Perkins' Washington Update. Perkins maintained that the discrimination provision was necessary so that "faith-based organizations [could]...compete on an equal footing for Federal funding within constitutional guidelines, without impairing the religious character of such organizations and without diminishing the religious freedom of beneficiaries."

"Religious discrimination has no place in government-funded programs," countered the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. "Instead of giving in to the Bush administration's unwise agenda, lawmakers should pass a job training package that respects all Americans' civil rights." The bill now moves on to the Senate.

SBA Establishes Faith-Based Center

In mid-February, the U.S. Small Business Administration joined nine other federal agencies in creating its own Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (website). The SBA claims that its office is aimed at assisting non-profit organizations familiarize themselves with the possibility of winning a grant for their work around aiding small businesses.

"By working more closely with faith-based and other organizations, we can advance the President's goal of bringing jobs and hope to economically distressed communities all across our nation," said SBA Administrator Hector V. Barrett.

According to a press release from the SBA, the agency's "field representatives are already developing workshops, training seminars and open houses to reach out and educate faith-based and community organizations about SBA programs and to ensure that these groups have equal access to the services."

Selling Faith to the States

In mid-March, Michigan's Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm "joined a growing number of politicians seemingly seeking to use the Bush' administration's so-called 'faith-based' initiative to curry favor with those so-called 'values voters,'" the Web site of Americans United for Separation of Church and State reported.

"In a speech laced with Bible references, Granholm told a state-organized gathering of religious groups and leaders that her administration would open a 'faith-based' initiatives office to funnel public dollars to religious groups that try to offer social services to the state's neediest people." Granholm told the crowd that it was important to connect faith-based organizations with state government.

And in Minnesota, "Gov. Tim Pawlenty is proposing the state hire a coordinator to work with faith-based groups seeking state grants to provide social services," Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) reported. The Governor is asking the Legislature to approve $300,000 to hire a coordinator and create a Minnesota Council of Faith-based Initiatives.

According to MPR, while 20 governors have already set up faith-based offices, the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation (website) "says the initiatives violate the constitutional separation of church and state."

Annie Laurie Gaylor, the co-founder of Freedom from Religion Foundation said that her group plans to file a suit against the state of Minnesota "over a faith-based grant, although she declined to give details," MPR reported. Gaylor added that "state initiatives like the one Pawlenty is proposing raise similar constitutional questions."

"It is showing preference to religion and endorsing religion, and the websites that are funded through the state are intermingling the state logos with religion, and I think it's a very ripe kind of violation to litigate," Gaylor maintained.

In early January Gaylor's Freedom from Religion Foundation won a suit they had filed against MentorKids USA, an Arizona-based prison mentoring program. U.S. District Court Judge John Shabaz ruled that federal funds awarded to MentorKids USA violated the First Amendment prohibition against the promotion of religion. The case against MentorKids USA was such a slam dunk that the Department of Health and Human Services had already withdrawn funding from the group before Judge Shabaz rendered his ruling. In fact, the Department "asked Shabaz to dismiss the suit, contending it was moot" because the grant had been withdrawn, the Capital Times of Madison, Wisconsin reported." But by the time the grant had been cut off the MentorKids program already had received $175,000 of the $225,000 three-year grant it had been promised in 2003.

According to the decision by Judge Shabaz, a 2003 memo to case managers written by MentorKids President John Gibson said that the program's mission statement was to "locate, train and empower mentors to be the presence of Christ to kids facing tough life challenges through one-on-one relationships." "Similar messages 'permeate' the program's Web site and board minutes, the decision stated," the Capital Times reported.

A mid-February suit filed in Pennsylvania by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Pennsylvania and Americans United for Separation of Church and State charged that "The only vocational training program available at a Pennsylvania county jail forces prisoners to participate in religious discussions, religious lectures and prayer," according to an ACLU Press Release.

"Incarcerated men and women should not have to subject themselves to religious proselytizing in order to get the skills they need to reenter the workforce," said Mary Catherine Roper, an attorney with the ACLU of Pennsylvania. "Giving public dollars to private groups to teach inmates job skills or promote other non-religious services is an important part of this country's social safety net, but using taxpayer dollars to convert a captive audience is unconstitutional."

Faithing Florida

Of all the states to come on board the faith-based train, Governor Jeb Bush's Florida is leading the pack. The centerpiece for the Governor has been the 2003 conversion of the Lawtey Correctional Institution in Bradford County, Florida to an all-faith-based facility. In addition, according to a recent wide-ranging report in the Florida Times-Union, "since about 2002...a number of [Florida] state governmental departments and agencies have created faith-based liaisons. Their job is to help eliminate obstacles to faith-based funding." They include: Agency for Workforce Innovation, Workforce Florida, Department of Children and Families, Department of Community Affairs, Department of Corrections, Department of Elder Affairs, Department of Education, Department of Health, Department of Juvenile Justice, Department of Management Services, Department of State, Front Porch Florida, and the Office of Drug Control.

"The governor has created a 25-member faith-based advisory board...and liaisons in state departments who are focused on making it easier for religious and grass-roots non-profits to qualify for social services grants," the newspaper also pointed out.

Jim Towey, director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, praised Florida for being "one of the leading laboratories on the faith-based initiative."

However, these so-called laboratories have not developed any systematic way of tracking the results of grants given to religious groups. Towey acknowledged that the lack of oversight was a problem in an interview with Christianity Today earlier this year.

When asked about "guidelines to measure the success of the grants," Towey answered rather feebly:

"There is a lot of support on the Hill to start putting more of an emphasis on outcomes and effectiveness. The President's budget is going to reflect that.

"Certainly, the local groups can help us by making a better case for what they do. There is not a lot of outcome measurement. The more they can say, 'We got this grant and here is what it changed,' the better."

One of the most troubling things to come out of the Freedom from Religion Foundation's suit in Wisconsin was an acknowledgement by the DHHS that there is little oversight regarding the monitoring of grants: A DHSS spokesperson told Annie Laurie Gaylor that "it was up to watchdog groups...to monitor the activities of groups getting federal funding." That, Gaylor pointed out, essentially means that "the government has no guidelines in place or desire to monitor these groups."

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >