search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
April 18, 2006

Senator Rick Santorum counting on the Pennsylvania Pastors Network

Following the example set by the Ohio Restoration Project, the PPN is organizing Christian conservatives to save Santorum's career

After two-term Pennsylvania Republican Senator Rick Santorum's book, "It Takes A Family: Conservatism and the Common Good" -- a sort-of rebuttal to Senator Hillary Clinton's "It TakesRick Santorum and the Pennsylvania Pastors Network a Village" -- was published by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (website), moaning and groaning was heard from the usual anti-Santorum crowd. But the anti-Santorum folks weren't completely alone; a resoundingly negative review also appeared at the website of Christianity Today, where reviewer John Wilson wrote: "Every Christian on the front lines of the culture wars should read this book -- as an example of how not to go about it."

While the book contains "well-reasoned policy recommendations and telling anecdotes...from the start, [it] has a divided heart," Wilson maintained. "Santorum's contemptuous references to 'liberals,' 'village elders,' and 'the Bigs' (this from a candidate who boasts Wal-Mart as a major donor) are pitched to the right-wing choir. One moment sneering in full talk-radio mode, the next moment sanctimoniously quoting Tocqueville, Santorum wants to have his cake and eat it, too."

Sanctimonious is as good a term as any to describe the embattled incumbent. These days, Sen. Rick Santorum, the 47-year old devout Roman Catholic who was once named one of "The 25 Most Influential Evangelicals in America" by Time magazine, is in the fight of his political career.

In November, he will more than likely square off against Pennsylvania State Treasurer Bob Casey Jr. -- who still needs to win the May primary -- the son of the very popular former Pennsylvania Governor Bob Casey. One of the unusual aspects of this race is that both Santorum and Casey have staked out anti-abortion positions, therefore basically taking that issue off the table.

With the abortion issue neutralized, Santorum, who was elected to the House in 1990 and the Senate in 1994, is aiming to mobilize his Christian conservative base with a slate of other "values voter" issues, including his support for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

According to the Washington Times, Santorum "raised more than $3 million in the first three months of the year and has a 2-to-1 cash advantage over his leading Democratic opponent." On April 18, the newspaper reported that Santorum finished the first quarter of the year with more than $9 million cash on hand, compared with $4.5 million for Casey, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission yesterday.

Thus far, Santorum "has raised more than $16 million for the November election [while] ... Casey has raised more than $8 million." Recent polls have shown Casey with a double-digit lead over Santorum.

Santorum's 'Compassionate Conservatism' and hurricane Katrina victims

In September 2005, Santorum gave a speech at the Heritage Foundation's First International Conservative Conference on Social Justice that "outlined the successes and failures, but more importantly the future of conservatism," according to Wikipedia. Two months later, it was turned into an op-ed piece for TownHall.com, outlining "his vision for 'Compassionate Conservatism.'"

Santorum wrote: "What I call 'Compassionate Conservatism' has something unique to offer to the shaping of our future.

"Compassionate Conservatism relies on healthy families, freedom of faith, a vibrant civil society, a proper understanding of the individual and a focused government to achieve noble purposes through definable objectives which offers hope to all."

"Conservatism is based upon the idea of preserving the good in our society, adding to it the wisdom of experience coupled with the courage and optimism of a new generation. This formula inspired Reagan and Thatcher to hope, and to work together to change the world. Let us build upon their example to be a beacon of hope in this troubled world."

Santorum's brand of "compassionate conservatism" was apparently missing in action on September 4, 2005. A few days after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, he was asked by Pittsburgh television station WTAE about evacuation warnings. Sentorum said that "people who don't heed those warnings and then put people at risk as a result of not heeding those warnings...There may be a need to look at tougher penalties on those who decide to ride it out and understand that there are consequences to not leaving."

A few days later, under a barrage of criticism by many people, including his opponent, Santorum backtracked. He told WTAE that it was obvious that "most of the people here in this case, an overwhelming majority of people just literally couldn't have gotten out on their own," he said. "Many didn't have cars ... And that really was a failure on the part of local officials in not making transportation available to get people out."

During a September 8, 2005 interview with public radio station WITF in Harrisburg, PA, Santorum claimed that "The weather service gave no warning, or not sufficient warning in my opinion, as to the effects when it came on land in Florida as a Category One hurricane ... Predictions were that it wasn't going to go out to the gulf and affect the western gulf coast, it was going to sort of head up to Florida or go right off the coast of Florida ... I'm not going to suggest when it comes to Katrina that there were any major errors. I don't know. This is something that I think needs to be investigated."

A press release issued a day later by Senator Jim DeMint, (R-SC) said that "After reviewing the actions taken by the National Weather Service, I am convinced that this was one of the most accurate hurricane predictions we have ever seen."

Perhaps it is no coincidence that "Santorum is the sponsor of legislation proposed to prevent the National Weather Service from competing with private sector weather services," Wikipedia pointed out.

Ethical lapses

In October of last year, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW - website), a legislative watchdog group, released a 93-page report (pdf) titled "Beyond DeLay: The 13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress". According to a CREW press release, the report "document[s] the egregious, unethical and possibly illegal activities of the most tainted Members of Congress."

Santorum, along with Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT) and Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN), was included on the list of 13 legislators.

According to the report, Santorum's "ethics issues stem from the manner in which he funded his children's education and the close timing between the Senator's introduction of a weather service bill benefiting for-profit weather companies and a donation from a private Pennsylvania weather company [AccuWeather Inc.]" to America's Foundation, his political action committee.

David Girard-diCarlo, a managing partner at Philadelphia-based law firm Blank Rome "serves as national finance director for" Santorum, the Wall Street Journal has reported. "Blank Rome has numerous lobbying clients. Girard-diCarlo oversees a group of more than 40 Washington lobbyists who hope to raise $4 million for Santorum's re-election bid. 'The senator is most appreciative' of such fundraising help, says Mr. Santorum's spokesman, Robert Traynham."

Pennsylvania Pastors Network

Recently, the Senator turned to the newly formed Pennsylvania Pastors Network (PPN - website) -- a group currently organizing training sessions in order "to enlist Pennsylvania pastors in turning out voters for the November election," the New York Times reported in late March -- for its support.

According to its website, the PPN is a "network of Biblically-faithful clergy and church liaisons whose objective is to build a permanent infrastructure of like-minded clergy who":

  • "Affirm the authority of Scripture
  • "Take seriously Jesus' command to be 'salt and light' to the culture
  • "Want to encourage informed Christian thinking about contemporary social issues
  • "Want to examine public policy issues without politicizing their pulpits, using well-prepared teaching and preaching resources
  • "Want to engage their congregations in taking part in our political process on a non-partisan basis."

"The [training] sessions could test the promises of the tax agency [the Internal Revenue Service] to step up enforcement of the law that prohibits such activity by [tax] exempt organizations," the New York Times reported.

In early March, the first training session was held at Valley Forge. The meeting, organized and sponsored by several groups including Let Freedom Ring, the Pennsylvania Family Institute, the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation & Urban Family Council, was attended by 125 clergy members.

Sen. Santorum was the only candidate to send a videotaped message. "I encourage you to let your voices be heard from the pulpit" on the important issues of the day, Santorum said.

"You are the leaders of the flock," Mr. Santorum said. "You have a responsibility to be informed and to inform" and "to help guide those who seek your counsel," especially about the importance of banning same-sex marriage.

According to OMB Watch, PPN "is comprised of two 501 (c)(3) (non-profit) organizations (the Pennsylvania Family Institute and the Urban Family Council) and two 501(c)(4) organizations [the West Chester, PA-based] Let Freedom Ring and the Pro-Life Federation)." While 501 (c)(3) groups are "prohibited from engaging in partisan activities, directly or indirectly ... 501 (c)(4) groups can endorse candidates, but a joint effort that includes 501 (c)(3)s must be nonpartisan." Additionally, 501(c)(4) organizations cannot have political action as their prime activity.

Former Chester County Commissioner Colin A. Hanna, the founder and president of Let Freedom Ring is also the founder of the anti-immigrant WeNeedAFence.com. Founded in 2004, Let Freedom Ring's activities are heavily financed by its chairman Dr. Jack Templeton, who is the son of John Templeton -- who owned Templeton Funds until 1992.

FactCheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, pointed out that Hanna's Let Freedom Ring, "has been running a pair of ads promoting the idea of building 'a state-of-the-art border security fence' along the US boundary with Mexico. It said it bought $100,000 worth of air time for the ad, which was seen nationally on CNN and Fox News." Hanna "gained some national attention for refusing to remove a plaque of the Ten Commandments from the county courthouse," while he was a member of the Chester County Commission.

The anti-immigration ad campaign shows "the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center while claiming 'illegal immigration from Mexico provides easy cover for terrorists," FactCheck.org reported.

Hanna, who described Santorum's book as "thoroughly and soundly grounded in Christian doctrine and Scripture as the revealed word of God," saw to it that the book was part of the swag passed out to clergy at the Valley Forge training session.

According to the Philadelphia Daily News, the Urban Family Council, "founded by well-known local conservative religious activist William Devlin, ... reaped a $10,000 grant from a controversial charity founded by Santorum, the Operation Good Neighbor Foundation."

The newspaper also reported "In 2003, Santorum and Specter successfully fought to earmark $3.1 million in federal funds for abstinence programs in Pennsylvania, including $126,000 for the Urban Family Council. [Betty Jean] Wolfe, [the president of the group] confirmed that ... [it] later received a second grant of approximately the same amount."

On March 22, CREW filed an IRS complaint against PPN "alleging that [its] ... get-out-the-vote training session ... may have violated IRS rules governing charities," according to the group's press release.

CREW's executive director, Melanie Sloan said "it appears that rather than engaging in legal, non-partisan get-out-the-vote efforts, the real mission of the Pennsylvania Pastors Network is to assist Senator Santorum in his re-election campaign. This is exactly the sort of political activity prohibited by IRS law." Sloan continued, "the IRS has already taken action against a liberal church in Pasadena, California for much less egregious activities. If the IRS is serious about enforcing the law equally, it will take action against those involved in creating the Pennsylvania Pastors Network as well."

Colin Hanna, president of Let Freedom Ring the sponsor of PPN characterized CREW as "a liberal front group masquerading as a non-partisan, non-political organization. The complaint filed today is no different from the one CREW filed against Let Freedom Ring for the work we did in 2004. CREW claimed then (as now) that we were violating the law. The IRS did not agree with CREW's biased assessment. Instead, the IRS dismissed the complaint because Let Freedom Ring had not violated the law."

"We and all our participants have followed, and will continue to follow, both the letter and spirit of the law," Hanna continued. "This demonstrates and reinforces our commitment to informing pastors and religious leaders of their rights under the First Amendment to be involved in their community's public policy debate(s), to educate them about issues of concern to people of faith, to conduct non-partisan voter registration drives and to exercise their rights as citizens."

The Rev. Frank Pavone, the national director of Priests for Life -- one of the most uncompromising Christian right organizations -- spoke at the training session and "invoked the prophet Ezekiel, whose voice brought a field of bones to life," the New York Times reported.

"You and I are standing before a field of dry bones, aren't we?" Pavone told the attendees. "Dead consciences. Destroyed life." Pavone "emphasized how important control of the Senate would be if another Supreme Court vacancy opened soon, potentially tipping the court against abortion rights," according to the New York Times. "This particular president needs the kind of support that he has today but might not necessarily have after 2006," Pavone said.

Later, the newspaper reported that Let Freedom Ring had "posted a notice on its website" calling attention to the fact that the PPN "was hiring 10 full-time organizers to help churches get out the vote, suggesting a sizable and well-financed effort."

"Evangelical or Catholic background is helpful," the site suggested.

In an interview with the New York Times, Hanna said that that the training sessions had nothing to do with the Santorum campaign: "He noted that the training sessions explicitly encouraged the members of the clergy to speak about policies and to avoid endorsing candidates, guidelines within the limits of tax laws. He also noted that one of the speakers was Raymond L. Flynn, a former Democratic mayor of Boston and ambassador to the Vatican who has become a supporter of President Bush and social conservative causes."

Gary Marx, who helped direct the Bush re-election campaign's work with Christian groups in 2004, oversees the get-out-the-vote effort.

In a press release dated March 21, 2006, the Reverend Barry Lynn, the executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, maintained that the Pennsylvania Pastors Network was "an under-the-radar campaign to re-elect Santorum. Pennsylvania pastors are being misled, and they need to be very careful. The Internal Revenue Service is watching carefully for violations of federal tax law this year."

(In late March, Bob Casey wrote a letter to the PPN requesting an opportunity to speak at one of their training sessions. "I am sure you are interested in clearly showing that the Pennsylvania Pastors Network does not endorse candidates," Casey said. "I would greatly appreciate being allowed a few minutes to share my values and priorities.")

A mid-April visit to the PPN website found that the organization is readying pastors for the release of the movie "The DaVinci Code," based on the mega-best seller of the same name, by offering free seminars "to help you educate your flocks about the upcoming" movie. "We have assembled a set of resources that Christian leaders will find helpful in refuting the outrageous assertions of this movie. Pastors are rising to the challenge and using this as an opportunity to evangelize the truth."

PPN has trained pastors to help them "learn how to educate their congregations about the Pennsylvania Marriage Protection Amendment; is working to de-fund Pennsylvania Planned Parenthood; and is recommending that "State legislatures should codify appropriate preferences for married couples (where available) in adoption law."

In the Mold of the Ohio Restoration Project

The Pennsylvania Pastors Network is modeled on the success of the Ohio Restoration Project (ORP - website), which is currently seeking to organize evangelical voters in that state to elect Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell as governor this year. At its website, the ORP states that its mission is "to create, fund, and operate a public information program for patriot pastors and the Christian community..."

According to an early April story in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the ORP is getting plenty of media attention these days: "The New York Times, USA Today, The American Prospect, National Public Radio and HBO, among others, all have come to Ohio to cover the influence that evangelical church leaders like [the Rev. Russell] Johnson [of Lancaster, Ohio's Fairfield Christian Church] are trying to exert on Ohio politics."

In addition to getting attention for its organizing work among Christian evangelicals, the ORP has been roundly criticized for blurring the lines between church and state.

"In January, 31 ministers from Ohio filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service asking that the agency investigate Johnson's church and the Ohio Restoration Project," the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported.

"The complaint also names the World Harvest Church in Canal Winchester, run by televangelist Rod Parsley, and its affiliated Center for Moral Clarity and Reformation Ohio.

"The complaint charges that these organizations are promoting conservative officeholders, especially Ken Blackwell, the Ohio secretary of state and candidate for governor. The complaint cites church-sponsored events featuring a single candidate -- Blackwell; partisan voter registration; and biased voter education materials.

Last month about 100 church leaders, including those who filed the complaint, formed 'We Believe Ohio,' an organization to push social-justice issues into the public arena as a way to move the political debate away from such issues as gay marriage."

Supporting Bush's Faith-Based Initiative

Santorum has played a leading role in supporting President Bush's faith-based initiative. His work often revolves around what is termed the "charitable choice" exemption. "Charitable choice" riders -- frequently tucked stealthily into legislation dealing with the provision of social services -- allow religious-based organizations to compete for government funds without having to give up their religious beliefs, including their opposition to state and local anti-discrimination measures.

In 2002, when the president's faith-based initiative was floundering in Congress, the administration called on Santorum and Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) to craft a compromise measure. Although their efforts failed, the faith-based initiative has moved forward through Bush's use of executive orders.

Earlier this month, the Allentown, Pennsylvania Morning Call reported that the El Shaddai Bethlehem Ministries (which is also known as the Bethlehem Christian Training Center), has "received more than $300,000 in federal aid through President Bush's controversial Faith and Community Based Initiative." The church celebrated its move into its newly renovated headquarters with "a week-long celebration" beginning with an inaugural dinner and remarks from Rick Santorum.

The Rev. Marilyn Hartman, the church's executive pastor, insists that the federal grants have gone toward the church's job training programs, its work with former prisoners, and towards preparing folks for home ownership. "Nonetheless, some have complained that faith-based money is being distributed to advance Republican Party goals," the newspaper reported. "Federal faith-based dollars have flowed more readily to areas where Republicans are in tight races, said Rob Boston, a spokesman for Americans United."

According to a White House news release issued last month, faith-based organizations in Pennsylvania received more than $72 million in federal grants in 2005, the fifth highest total among the 50 states.

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >