search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
May 14, 2006

Anti-Gay leader to mobilize legions of "values voters" for Kenneth Blackwell in Ohio

Phil Burress' Cincinnati, Ohio-based Citizens for Community Values goes statewide

On May 2, 2006 Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio's controversial Black conservative Secretary of State defeated current Attorney General Jim Petro in the Republican gubernatorial primary.Kenneth Blackwell Phil Burress, the head of an Ohio-based political action committee called Citizens for Community Values Action (CCVA), observed that Blackwell -- the candidate his organization backed -- won because of his longtime support for "family values," particularly his backing of Ohio's anti-same sex marriage amendment which passed in 2004. Burress expects Blackwell to defeat his Democratic challenger, Congressman Ted Strickland, and to help get that done he intends to mobilize legions of "values voters."

A few weeks earlier, members of a Cincinnati, Ohio-based group called Equal Rights Not Special Rights (ERNSP - a 501(c)(3) charity), another of Phil Burress' enterprises, marched into the office of Joe Gray, the city's finance director, carrying some 14 to 15 thousand signatures -- twice the number necessary -- from city residents on petitions calling for the repeal of the city's new lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality ordinance. According to a recent report in Gay People's Chronicle, the "city council passed the ordinance last month" but the intervention by ERNSP -- just before it was scheduled to take effect on April 14 -- will force the ordinance onto the November ballot.

Thirteen years ago Burress' Citizens for Community Values (CCV) played a pivotal role in forcing the removal of "sexual orientation" from Cincinnati's original human rights ordinance, thereby prohibiting the city from protecting gays, lesbians or bisexuals. Voters finally repealed article 12 in 2004.

In fact, Phil Burress, the born again Christian and one-time union leader and porn addict, "is behind almost every anti-gay effort in Ohio," the Gay People's Chronicle recently pointed out.

CCV (website), another 501(c)(3) charity connected to Burress, was founded in 1983 by Dr. Jerry Kirk, then pastor of College Hill Presbyterian Church, and others. Burress was an early volunteer with the organization. In 2004 he was paid $165,000 for full time employment at CCV. The organization didn't start out by targeting gays and lesbians; it was more focused on the strip clubs and pornography that it claimed was inundating the Greater Cincinnati area and endangering residents.

Few would have imagined that from such humble beginnings more than two decades ago Phil Burress and his assorted organizations would not only still be on the frontlines of the culture war, but that he and his groups would in fact be flourishing.

These days the organization has a full plate. From supporting Kenneth Blackwell for governor, to opposing a recent Bush Administration proposal to label hardcore pornographic sites on the Internet (Burress believes that they should be eliminated, not labeled); from increasing its political presence in the state capital, to building its Internet capacity, which includes new websites monitoring the political positions of candidates running for state office, as well as a site devoted specifically to fighting pornography in hotels across the country.

Agape Press, a Christian evangelical news service, recently reported that Burress had formed a new political action committee "in order to endorse and support candidates who espouse traditional values."

Burress told Agape Press that the creation of his PAC "came about as a result of frustration over trying to get a marriage protection measure added to his state's constitution. 'When we did the marriage amendment here in Ohio in 2004, we were absolutely flabbergasted when our governor, our two U.S. senators -- Senator Voinovich, Senator DeWine -- and our state Attorney General Jim Petro all came out against the marriage amendment.'"

Burress' CCV Action PAC endorsed Blackwell: "Ken is just stalwart on the pro-family issues," Burress told Agape Press. "He was our spokesman on the marriage issue. He is just so solid on all the issues -- a committed Christian [who] refuses to hide the fact that he loves the Lord with all of his heart. That's the type of leadership that we need."

At the group's recent annual banquet on the campus of Xavier University -- attended by some 400 people paying $50 bucks a ticket -- Rabbi Daniel Lapin , the founder of Toward Tradition, the conservative Jewish organization, and one of the Christian right's favorite rabbis, told the crowd that "Politics is the practical application of our religious beliefs." Lapin added, "If Citizens for Community Values fails in its mission, we all lose."

All the proceeds from the dinner went directly to the organization as "the cost was picked up by well-heeled backers, including Carl H. Lindner, a Cincinnati financier and longtime GOP contributor," the Columbus Dispatch reported.

From porn again to born again

According to a profile of Burress titled, "Hometown Heroes: Marriage Man," in Focus on the Family's Citizen magazine, he became addicted to porn at 16. He would save up his money, or steal it, and visit the smut peddlers in downtown Cincinnati.

"I was totally obsessed," Burress said. "So when someone asks me about the harm porn causes, I can answer. Porn teaches you to use, abuse and take -- that's how it changed my view of women. Every man who's used porn or been hooked on porn knows I tell the truth."

Citizen reported that Burress' "first two marriages ended in divorce. While still in his second marriage, Burress got a call from his newlywed daughter, whose husband, an evangelist, was speaking at a church in the Cincinnati suburb of Loveland. 'It was five minutes from my house, but I didn't want anything to do with it,' he said. 'I spent the first 18 years of my life in an evangelical Church of God. I lived a double life from age 14 to 18, and then I stopped going to church. I had been away 20 years.'"

Eventually, a visit to church changed his life: "I actually bowed my head and said, 'Lord, if you want me so bad, you send my son-in-law back here to get me,' " he said. "I thought I'd put God in a tight box; my son-in-law wouldn't come all the way to the back of the church. But when I raised my head, there he was. I ran to the front of the church and became a new creation."

"The Lord called me to go public with my problem," Burress told Citizen. "It wasn't fun. I got a lot of ridicule and people making fun. But once Billy Graham did my story in Decision magazine and I started doing radio and TV interviews, my story got out there worldwide. My phone rang off the hook with men calling with the same story, asking for help. The phone is still ringing."

Burress met his third wife, Vickie, at an American Family Association convention in Tupelo, Miss., in 1996. "I was going through a divorce at the time," Vickie said. "My former husband was hooked on porn, and I was in an abusive relationship. I was just having a hard time in life at that point, trying to survive and raise two kids. I never planned on getting remarried. I just thought I'd be a single mom and take care of my kids."

Two years later they met again at another conference, became good friends and were married in Sept. 19, 1998. "She's a wonderful wife and my best friend," Phil said. "We travel together and speak together. She's able to help women who call in here whose men are using porn."

CCV on the march

According to a late-March report in the Columbus Dispatch, the organization, which is "best known for almost single-handedly engineering Ohio's gay marriage ban amendment in 2004 ... is branching out by forming a political action committee to support candidates financially and mounting a radio campaign to lobby federal officials about cable television choice." The newspaper also reported that one "donor from Tennessee gave $100,000 for the latter cause."

"In addition, the group hired two full-time lobbyists in Columbus, set up a Web site (Cleanhotels.com) to pressure hotels into discontinuing pay per-view porn, intervened in a sex-education lawsuit in Boyd County, Kentucky., and sent issues questionnaires to hundreds of candidates for office statewide. The results will be posted on another Web site." The candidate's responses can be found at "Ohio Election Central".

In time for the May 2 primary, Citizens for Community Values posed a series of questions to nearly 2,000 candidates running for public office in Ohio on "key issues such as eminent domain, limited government, abortion, marriage, gambling, and education," the Ohio Election Central website pointed out.

"Even judicial candidates were asked to give voters some insight into their judicial philosophy by telling us which organizations receive their donations and their volunteered time, which ones have endorsed them and given campaign contributions."

"Among the Christian conservative groups, over time there's been a gradual expansion of their agenda," John Green, a University of Akron political scientist and a frequent commentator on the religious right," told the Columbus Dispatch. "They survived because they've become better organized and more adept at performing their functions. They're really quite good at it."

According to the CCV website, its mission is "to promote Judeo-Christian moral values, and to reduce destructive behaviors contrary to those values, through education, active community partnership, and individual empowerment at the local, state and national levels."

The organization maintains that it "strive[s] to be a leader in the restoration of those Judeo-Christian moral values upon which this country was founded in hopes of leaving a lasting legacy of citizens endeavoring to foster and maintain healthy, wholesome, safe, and happy communities."

Since achieving "results" is the name of the game, CCV, which calls itself a "First Amendment free speech organization," boasts an impressive record. Its website claims that:

  • 95% of the 2800 stores that sell magazines in Greater Cincinnati do not sell Playboy-type ("soft-core") pornography.
  • 95% of the stores that sell or rent videos in Greater Cincinnati do not handle adult (X-rated) videos, with most counties being totally free of hard-core pornography.
  • Neither the city of Cincinnati nor Hamilton County has any peep booths, adult x-rated theaters, massage parlors, or strip bars. Only three stores exist that concentrate in adult material but are not classified as sexually oriented businesses. Fortunately, all are under close scrutiny by law enforcement with charges of pandering obscenity currently in the courts.
  • The 17 counties in Greater Cincinnati have the fewest number of strip bars of any major metropolitan area, currently five, all of which are outside of Hamilton County in outlying areas.

The group has a national presence as well, organizing, coordinating and chairing two "pro-family forums that bring together leaders on a regular basis for strategizing, developing policy and mobilizing grassroots efforts":

National Pro-Family Forum on Pornography -- "This group includes representatives from most national pro-family organizations and meets every three months, usually in Washington, D.C. The forum has launched several campaigns and projects."

National Pro-Family Forum on Homosexuality -- "This group includes representatives from most of the national pro-family organizations and meets every three months, usually in Washington, D.C. The group's first organized effort was the National Campaign to Protect Marriage that mobilized national and local pro-family leaders in all 50 states to work together to defend traditional 'one man-one woman' marriage. However, their major achievement has been The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and other similar laws that were passed in 36 states since 1996. Another major achievement of this forum was the 'Truth in Love' full-page ad and campaign printed in many major newspapers and on TV.

In addition to so-called family values issues, involvement in the state's electoral politics seems to put gas in the organization's tank. Citizens for Community Values is involved in a number of statewide elections and has been particularly supportive of the bid by Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio's Black conservative Republican Secretary of State, to win the statehouse in November.

Over the years, Burress has become a major player in Ohio politics. Although it is difficult to determine exactly what his relationship is with the Ohio Restoration Project (ORP), the powerful network of Christian fundamentalist pastors aiming to remake the state, at the least, there appears to be mutual admiration: According to a Citizens USA report, Citizens for Community Values has "joined" with the ORP "on several projects." Burress has "expressed his encouragement with the recent development" of the ORP. "In my 25 years of public service this is one of the finest grass roots efforts to mobilize pastors and pews to make a difference in America," Burress said.

The ORP's Pastor Russell Johnson of the Fairfield Christian Church in Lancaster, Ohio, pointed out that Burress "can teach us a great deal of how to be effective in moving Ohio towards a stronger, more Godly representation among our state and national leaders. I'm grateful to be on Phil and Vicky's prayer list."

'Hardcore pornography should be eliminated completely'

Pornography, however, is still a major concern for Burress. In addition to his get-porn-out-of-America's-hotels project, he recently voiced displeasure over a new regulatory initiative proposal by the Bush administration -- through attorney General Alberto Gonzales -- that would require the placement of government warning labels on websites that publish content deemed sexually explicit or pornographic and establishes severe penalties for noncompliance.

According to CNETNews.com, "The Bush administration's proposal would require commercial Web sites to place 'marks and notices' to be devised by the Federal Trade Commission on each sexually explicit page. The definition of sexually explicit broadly covers depictions of everything from sexual intercourse and masturbation to 'sadistic abuse' and close-ups of fully clothed genital regions."

Burress maintains "that hardcore pornography should be eliminated completely [and he] ... thinks Gonzales should take anti-pornography regulation to the next level by prosecuting satellite television providers like Comcast and Time Warner that sell hardcore pornography," the arstechnica website reported.

"You cannot separate child pornography and hardcore, sexually explicit pornography," Burress said. "That's where our children are being harmed, that's where these pedophiles start. They start with the hardcore pornography. ... [Satellite TV providers and other hardcore pornography distributors] are the culprits and that's where the problem begins and to just say you're going to crack down on child pornography, this will not fix the problem."

Lack of transparency

The current campaign by Equal Rights Not Special Rights/Citizens for Community Values to ban civil rights protections for gays is not without controversy. Gay People's Chronicle reported that "Ohio law requires that petition circulators 'file an itemized statement, made under penalty of election falsification, showing in detail' money or things of value paid for circulating petitions, 'full names and addresses of all persons to whom such payments or promises were made,' and 'names and addresses of anyone who contributed anything of value to be used in circulating such petitions.'"

On April 19, ERNSR filed a statement "saying that $40,000 was spent, [and] then claim[ed] a First Amendment right not to disclose the rest of the information.

"That statement was signed by David Miller, who is acting as ERNSR's agent. He is also vice president of Citizens for Community Values, another of Burress' anti-gay organizations," Gay People's Chronicle reported.

Gary Wright, the chair of Citizens to Restore Fairness, a gay civil rights group supporting the city's equality ordinance told Gay People's Chronicle that the organization's refusal to reveal its financial support isn't anything new.

Last year, "Wright and former Cincinnati mayor Bobbi Sterne filed an elections complaint against Burress and his enterprises, accusing them of laundering approximately $3 million through Citizens for Community Values Action ... to conceal the contributors to Burress' 2004 campaigns to defend Article 12 and pass an Ohio constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. The Ohio Elections Commission took no action."

"Citizens for Community Values and its assorted enterprises are not particularly transparent about anything," Eric Resnick, staff reporter for the Cleveland-based Gay People's Chronicle told Media Transparency. Resnick, who has been reporting on Phil Burress and CCV for several years, pointed out "It has never been held accountable or made to explain the way they fund campaigns. The truth is, they have been getting away with stuff for many years. There are huge amounts of money being laundered through those charities and somehow making their way to these campaigns -- possibly as much as $3 million dollars."

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >