search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

RELATED LINKS

Internal Links

Profiles:

Profile of Person John J. DiIulio
Profile of Person Marvin Olasky

Other internal:

Original MT Report MT's Faith-based watch

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
June 5, 2006

Jim Towey's brave new faith-based world

The head of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives moves on after successfully promoting and expanding the president's religion-based patronage system

"President Bush's faith-based and community initiative is deeply rooted in America's heartland. It's established, and will continue to bear fruit for years to come, and I thank God for President Bush's leadership on an initiative that has faced a steady head wind since Day One." -- Jim Towey

Unlike the sudden resignation of CIA Director Porter Goss on Friday, May 5 – which caught the media by surprise -- the long anticipated replacement of White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan with columnist and the Fox News Channel's Tony Snow, or the recent replacement of Treasury Secretary John Snow with Goldman Sachs chief executive Henry Paulson, when Jim Towey announced his decision to move on, the media barely blinked an eye.

On April 18, 2006 Towey, who served for more than four years as Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Office of Community and Faith-Based Initiatives, announced that as of July 1, he would become president of Saint Vincent College, a small Catholic school in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

In announcing his resignation, Towey told reporters that he expected the faith-based program to continue in the future regardless of who may be in the White House: "I think you'll be talking about this for generations. Because we will never help our poor if we don't give them reasons to change, and government can't love and government cannot bond and connect with our poor. They will never have the trust of the poor like a rabbi or a preacher or some of these grass-roots groups that may have no particular faith at all."

That there was a general lack of media interest in Towey's departure may say more about the media than his record.

Towey has unquestionably left his mark: It would not be an understatement to give him credit for helping set the president's then-floundering faith-based initiative back on track.

With Towey at the helm, the president's faith-based initiative has become part of the political landscape: faith-based offices spread to several more Cabinet-level departments; more government money was handed out to faith-based groups -- a generous portion going to minority-run churches; rules and regulations required of faith-based organizations were relaxed; "Targeted Workshop on Faith-Based and Community Initiatives" were organized to bring new faith-based groups on board; more states got involved in developing their own faith-based offices; and executive orders became the main vehicle through which the faith-based initiative has spread itself across the political landscape.

In helping to put all this into motion, Towey may have also taken some significant chunks out of the wall of separation between church and state.

‘Filled with gratitude...'

Unlike his predecessor John DiIulio, and former Towey aide, David Kuo, who were highly critical of the White House's handling of the initiative following their departures, Towey, in a recent conversation with Marvin Olasky, the editor in chief of World magazine, said that he was "filled with gratitude" for having served in the administration.

He also pointed out that he was "saddened by the stranglehold that certain entrenched interests have." Towey "mentioned specifically the National Head Start Association: ‘Groups that get Head Start money will keep it until they go out of business," Olasky reported. "He also mentioned drug treatment block grants that continue to be given whether ‘anyone recovers in the programs or not' and after-school programs. He spoke of ‘really dynamic programs on the local level' developed by local Catholic Charities, but said, ‘I've been disheartened to see how partisan the national organization has been.'"

According to Olasky, Towey pointed out that faith-based organizations were still only getting a very small piece of the pie: Congress has "earmarked hundreds of millions, and faith-based groups only get a tiny percentage," Towey said.

In an interview with Ian Wilhelm of The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Towey said that he expects the faith-based initiative to continue providing federal grants to religious organizations for the provision of social services. Towey told the newspaper that "The wall between church and state is still standing, faith-based groups have been welcomed into the public square, and the poor have benefited from having access to their effective programs." According to Towey, the process has been institutionalized "and will continue to bear fruit for years and years to come."

"I don't believe a successor president can come in and say, let's set the clock back on civil rights and begin discriminating again against faith-based charities," he added.

According to The Chronicle of Philanthropy, "Towey is widely credited with pushing the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department and other federal agencies to allow more religious groups to tap social-service funds. A survey released by the administration last month [found that] seven federal agencies in the 2005 fiscal year awarded religious groups 2,760 grants --22 percent more than in 2004. Those grants were worth more than $2.1-billion."

In addition, "Towey has pushed state and local authorities to do more to get religious charities involved in providing government-financed social service. So far, 32 governors and 115 mayors have either established offices or appointed a liaison to work with churches and other sectarian organizations, according to the White House."

"His work on behalf of the poor and the sick has improved lives. ... He is a man of great integrity, and I thank him for his service," President Bush said.

"Jim has been very effective administratively," said John Bridgeland, the former director of the White House's USA Freedom Corps who is now a consultant to nonprofit groups. Towey made a "quiet transformation of government."

Waging war against church-state separation

Barry Lynn, the executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State had a different view: "Jim Towey has waged an unrelenting war against church-state separation," the Rev. Lynn said in an AU press release.

"He played a key role in using the ‘faith-based' initiative for improper partisan purposes, and he did little or nothing to see that Americans get the social-service help they need from their government. That's a sad legacy to leave.

"Towey was the Bush administration's point man in trying to roll back civil rights laws barring religious discrimination in hiring in government-funded programs," Lynn continued. "I am pleased that he failed to push that terrible idea through Congress."

During his press conference, Towey also took a swipe at critics of the program, twice calling them "secular extremists," a comment that irritated Holly Holllman of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.

Hollman told the Associated Baptist Press that she thought that type of "rhetoric is unnecessary." "On several occasions, the BJC voiced its concerns to him and sought ways to work together more constructively," Hollman said.

"Unfortunately, Towey never seemed to recognize that people of faith criticized the initiative precisely because of their faith. The initiative diminishes the role of religion by threatening the independence of houses of worship, funding religious discrimination and blurring the line between church and state that protects religious freedom."

Where's the beef?

One issue that Towey failed to adequately address during his tenure was whether the faith-based initiative was achieving "results," and how those results could be quantified.

Over the years, both President Bush and Towey have cruised about the country making their case for the faith-based initiative by telling and retelling inspiring tales of individual redemption. The administration has yet to produce significant documentation showing that these stories are anything other than delightful anecdotes.

"The studies I've seen show that religious groups perform about the same as secular charities, though evaluating any social-service effort is very difficult," The Chronicle of Philanthropy's Ian Wilhelm said in an e-mail to Media Transparency. "Towey himself complains that secular charities have not successfully documented their results, but religious charities are hard pressed to do the same."

Sheila Suess Kennedy was the principal investigator for, and co-editor of "Charitable Choice: First Results From Three States" (pdf), an in-depth evaluation of the Charitable Choice provisions of the 1996 welfare bill. Compiled from data gathered before Bush became president and launched his faith-based initiative, the study, published in 2003 by Indiana University's Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, was "the only study of which we are aware that actually attempted to measure results empirically," Kennedy told Media Transparency in a recent e-mail.

"There have been and continue to be many ‘case studies,' but what we did --on an admittedly small scale -- was compare results obtained in Indiana by faith-based and secular job-training and placement providers participating in the state's contracting regime. In a nutshell, our findings were that this group of FBOs [Faith-Based Organizations], at least, did not perform as well, even when controlling for size of agency, age and experience, etc," said Kennedy, the co-author with Wolfgang Bielefeld of the upcoming book "Charitable Choice at Work: Faith-Based Partnerships in the States," an in-depth evaluation of Charitable Choice and the Faith-Based Initiative.

"Clients placed by secular and FB [Faith-Based] providers had a statistically equivalent likelihood of being placed in a job, at roughly equivalent pay rates, but clients of secular agencies were more likely to get full-time, rather than part-time, employment, and more likely to receive benefits such as health insurance."

‘The initiative is constitutional' says Towey

During his departure press conference Towey mentioned the word results, but he was referring more to the program's very existence, not its specific accomplishments: "I'll leave this office, after proudly serving here for four years, deeply grateful for the results and accomplishments that we've achieved," he said. "The court has upheld repeatedly the initiative is constitutional."

"It is true, no court has said the initiative taken as a whole is unconstitutional," Chip Lupu, who teaches at George Washington University Law School, told ABP. "But [Towey] knows that, in the cases in the lower courts that are initiative-related, there are five or six -- and they've lost almost every one." Lupu also noted that there are similar lawsuits pending in other federal courts.

While Towey claims that the faith-based initiative is set in stone, his resignation may trigger another round of debate about its efficacy. In addition to the Rev. Barry Lynn raising objections to the faith-based initiative, the Acton Institute's Father Robert Sirico recently suggested that "the departure of Jim Towey ... is a good occasion to reflect on how the Bush administration program has impacted American religious and political culture."

In addition to the possibility of further reflection about the faith-based initiative, the Madison, WI-based Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF - website), has initiated a number of legal actions against the faith-based initiative. In recent weeks, the organization filed two broad-based challenges to the initiative; one targets the Veteran's Administration for mixing religion and medical care, and the other goes after the federal prison system, where a number of faith-based projects are currently underway and more are being proposed.

The president's faith-based initiative "has been going on long enough so that it has unfortunately created legal precedent," Annie Laurie Gaylor, the co-president of FFRF, told me in a recent e-mail. "But we have won nearly every faith-based challenge we have taken, and FFRF has taken more than any other group. When the courts are actually looking at what the money is going for, they are finding it unconstitutional. But it has been extraordinarily hard to get at the source. You win one lawsuit in one state, but you know the same thing is probably going on in 49 other states," Gaylor pointed out.

In the end, "Perhaps Jim Towey's legacy is best expressed by his infamous Freudian slip to ‘level the praying field,' a comment he made in late 2003," Gaylor said.

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >