search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
September 14, 2006

DeLayed and confused

Under cloud of illegality "The Hammer" attempts to rehabilitate his image

In early-May, when former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) announced that he would be resigning from Congress the following month, he delivered a letter to Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert advising him that he was moving on in order "to pursue new opportunities to engage in the important cultural and political battles of our day from an arena outside of the U.S. House of Representatives."

DeLay who had resigned his post as Majority Leader in September 2005 after a Texas grand jury indicted him on charges of campaign-finance violations tied to Texans for a Republican Majority, appears now to be reduced to sending silly e-mail to rally his troops on behalf of a conservative contestant on an ABC television reality show.

DeLay sent out a mass mailing asking viewers of "Dancing With the Stars" to vote for a former "Republican Babe of the Week"

According to the Washington Post, "The Hammer," who had close ties to the disgraced and indicted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff, is no longer: designing some redistricting scam to guarantee GOP control of Texas' congressional delegation for ages to come; doling out hundreds of thousands in PAC money to Republican Party candidates; teaming up with Abramoff; or hustling votes in Congress for George W. Bush. Instead, he "is using his post-congressional clout to influence another election -- the viewer voting on ABC's ‘Dancing With the Stars 3,'" which features 11 celebrities and 11 actual dancers, and which had its season premiere earlier this week.

DeLay recently "sent out a mass mailing asking his friends to vote for Sara Evans [one of the program's celebrity contestants] because she "represents good American values."

At the same time, DeLay urged his supporters not to vote for television talk show host Jerry Springer, another celebrity participant.

"I am writing to you today in an effort to help a good friend of mine, country music singer and GOP supporter Sara Evans," who sang at the 2004 Republican convention " and "has been a strong supporter of the Republican Party and represents good American values in the media," DeLay tells supporters. "Let's show Sara that same support by watching and voting for her each week to help her win this competition. One of her opponents on the show is ultra liberal talk show host Jerry Springer. We need to send a message to Hollywood and the media that smut has no place on television by supporting good people like Sara Evans." (For the complete email see here.)

Think Progress, a project of the American Progress Action Fund, reported that "Evans also sang at the 2004 Presidential Dinner, where Bush said that he "love[d] the voice of Sara Evans.'" Think Progress also noted that Evans appears in a photo spread as "Republican BABE of the Week" -- one week after Kathryn Harris graced the page – as well as in a picture with her husband, Craig Schelske, and President Bush.

DeLay's support for Evans may in part be due to the fact that her husband, identified by Alternet's Evan Derkacz as an "ultra-rightwing theocracy-supporting...failed Republican candidate and cute-as-a-button executive director of Americandestiny.com," is also a GOP activist. According to his website bio, Schelske "has vast experience in media, politics, publicity & entertainment [and] has a Masters Degree in Public Policy from [Pat Robertson's] Regent University & a B.S. Degree in International Business & Marketing from Oregon State University."

Schelske is currently the President of Gingerdog, Inc., "specializing in guiding the entrepreneurial aims for Sara Evans' entertainment career" and is the Chairman of the Alexandria, Virginia-based CRAIG PAC, which his website describes as "a national political action committee dedicated to electing Republicans at the federal and state level." The PAC aims to "assist candidates and Republican organizations in raising money and preparing for the 2006 elections."

According to Derkacz, American Destiny, also based in Alexandria, "is an organization that promotes a revisionist history of America's founding as a theocracy and dedicates itself to busting the ‘myth' of separation of church and state." American Destiny frequently "use[s] the discredited scholarship of ... David Barton," the founder of WallBuilders.

American Destiny (AD), a 501 (c) (3) non-profit group, was founded by Kendall Hewitt, who, according to the bio posted at the AD website, worked in "news and entertainment for an ABC affiliate news station, Country Music Television, and Gaylord Entertainment." He "presently serves as a Regional Manager for Compassion International, a child development organization dedicated to releasing children from poverty in Africa, Asia, Central and South America."

On the front page of its website, AD points out that it has received a $125,000 matching grant, but it doesn't disclose where the money has come from.

DeLay's entrance into the battle over who will reign as the program's top celebrity dancer caught another celebrity participant by surprise. "I thought that it was a joke at first," MSNBC's Tucker Carlson told ABC News' Jake Tapper and Artis Waters. And then he remembered, he said, "Oh, yeah, Tom DeLay lives in any irony-free world."

Carlson, not about to be one-upped by the political intervention of DeLay, solicited and received the endorsement of the Rev. Al Sharpton. According to reality blurred/the reality tv news digest, run by Andy Dehnart, Carlson "told the New York Daily News' Lloyd Grove that he asked Sharpton for the endorsement, because ‘Nobody turns out the vote like the Reverend Al.'

Sharpton issued an obviously tongue-in-cheek statement "praising" Carlson and "encouraging his supporters to vote for him:"

"We are living in trying and uncertain times. That's why now, more than ever, we need a strong leader who will stand up for what we believe. Better yet, we need a leader who will dance for what we believe. Tucker Carlson is just such a dancer. Watch Tucker do the cha-cha and then call in your vote to make sure he advances to the next week's show. You can call as often as you like. Remember: Voting in celebrity dance contests is not just your right in this country, it's a privilege...If you sit back idly and fail to perform your civic duty, lesser dancers could win this competition. America simply cannot afford that."

Sharpton also pointed out that he wanted "to balance the influence of DeLay and at the same time get a right-winger off talk television and help Tucker find another career. I think it would be a great contribution to society to have him as a cheeseball disco dancer than a talk-show host propagating right-wing politics."

No news yet from the Jerry Springer camp as to whether he expects any last minute surprise endorsements.

Meanwhile, back in Texas

Back in his former home state DeLay recently emceed Vision America's Heroes of the Faith Gala; a gathering of high-powered conservative religious and political leaders, according to People for the American Way's Right Wing Watch.

An email sent out by Vision America's Rick Scarborough, pointed out that more than 500 Pastors, elected officials and supporters gathered at the Westin Galleria Hotel Grand Ballroom in Houston on Thursday, August 31 "to celebrate Vision America's accomplishments of the past year and to hear about the challenges of the next 12 months." According to Scarborough, "This year's Gala marked our seventh meeting in the past eight years, and it was by far the most impacting. Attendees included the Lt. Governor of Texas and the Mayor of Houston as well as dozens of Judges and State Senators and Representatives. Congressman Tom DeLay emceed the event and received numerous affirmations from the supportive crowd that evening."

In a pre-event communiqué, Scarborough pointed out that Vision America's "War on Christians Conference" in Washington, DC "was a phenomenal success gaining the attention of the national press and further establishing Vision America as a ministry that is significantly contributing to the national cultural debate."

In Texas, Republican Governor Rick Perry has ordered a special election for Tuesday, November 7, to temporarily replace DeLay. The winner of the special election will fill his seat until DeLay's term expires in January and then it will be filled by the winner of the general election.

According to the Associated Press, the GOP's Shelley Sekula-Gibbs, a Houston City Councilwoman will run as a write-in candidate because the courts refused to remove DeLay from the ballot.

The September 6 edition of Slate's "Today's Papers" ran this interesting item regarding a Wall Street Journal story involving DeLay's wife:

The WSJ notes that the Justice Department is investigating whether former House Majority Tom DeLay's wife actually did any work to receive her $3,200 monthly salary from a lobbying firm [Alexander Strategy Group]. FBI agents have been interviewing former and current employees at the firm to find out if Christine DeLay ever actually came to work and what exactly her role was in the company. The Journal says this latest round of questioning shows the investigation is continuing and that the Justice Department may be trying to force DeLay to plead guilty by investigating his wife.

According to the Wall Street Journal, "Alexander Strategy was run by a pair of Mr. DeLay's former aides: Tony Rudy, who pleaded guilty to bribery charges in March; and Edwin Buckham, who remains under investigation. The firm also shared clients with Jack Abramoff."

In last month's interviews, investigators also asked about $144,000 that Mrs. DeLay received from one of Mr. DeLay's fund-raising committees, the Americans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee, which was housed at the lobbying firm's offices. Investigators also inquired about fees paid to Mr. DeLay's daughter, Dani DeLay Ferro, a longtime political consultant to her father.

Finally, in an early-September statement that should thrill bibliophiles across America, and clear up all the various mysteries surrounding the man and his family, DeLay announced that he would be writing a book about his life and career in politics. "This is a book that's going to be the history of my career, how it furthered the conservative cause, with my spiritual walk and what I think the conservative cause ought to do next," DeLay, a born-again Christian, told the Associated Press.

According to DeLay, the book will explain how "everything I've done in my career furthered the conservative cause" and changed the political landscape and culture of Washington. Scheduled to be published by Penguin next spring, and written with the help of Stephen Mansfield, author of "The Faith of George W. Bush," the book has a working title of "No Retreat, No Surrender: The American Passion of Tom DeLay." According to AP, DeLay "declined to reveal how much he'll be paid. ‘Not as much as I wanted,' he quipped.

Will DeLay's book reveal the unexpurgated truth about his dealings with Abramoff? Will it get into the whys and wherefores of the activities of Tony Rudy, the former deputy chief of staff for DeLay, who pleaded guilty this year to "a scheme and artifice to defraud and deprive" the public of "the honest services" of House staffers? Will DeLay come clean about the shenanigans of former DeLay Press Secretary and Abramoff lobbying partner Michael Scanlon, who last November pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe a congressman and other public officials?

Or would a more apt title for the book be, "Slipping and Sliding: The Hammer Dances Around the Truth."

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >