|
|||||||||||||||||
RELATED LINKSInternal LinksGrants to:
Profiles: Related stories:
External LinksCursor.orgMediaTransparency.org sponsor More stories by Rob Levine The PBS Home Team Media Transparency writersAndrew J. Weaver FundometerEvaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement. |
ORIGINAL RESEARCHRob Levine Commentary: 'American Experiment' gets free ride from uncritical mediaReprinted with the permission of Mpls Star-Tribune Ten years ago, the Minneapolis Star Tribune greeted the creation of a new, conservative think tank called the Center of the American Experiment (CAE) with an editorial titled "Welcome a conservative policy forum." The newspaper and other established media, notably Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) and KTCA-TV (now TPT), opened up their news pages, opinion pages and public airwaves to often unmediated speeches, conferences and position papers produced by the center. Since then the Star Tribune has published more than 300 stories or opinion pieces by and about the CAE, yet focused almost no attention either on its institutional connections or funding, despite repeated red flags presented by the center's behavior. Because of its tax-exempt status, the center, in theory, is not allowed to intervene in campaigns, nor underwrite the activities of a political party. According to IRS rules, organizations that engage in such activities may be subjected to financial penalties and/or revocation of their 501(c)(3) status. An example of a breach of such rules, and the first clue that more investigation of the center was needed, came in its first year of operation. In 1990, Mitch Pearlstein, the center's creator and president, illegally donated tax-exempt funds to the Senate campaign of Republican Rudy Boschwitz and to the state Republican Party, one of the few financial acts of the center ever reported by the Star Tribune. That, however, was just the beginning of the center's relationship to the Republican Party. Over the years the center has hosted numerous journalists, theorists and politicians of the national Republican Party, forged close ties with the Minnesota Republican Party and, perhaps most significantly, turned out to be a valuable cog in the national conservative-Republican movement. These ties have become more pronounced as the years have gone by. In the beginning, most of the center's events were symposia or panel discussions. Recently, however, it has sponsored more one-person presentations, generally with Republican celebrity figures, such as the one last November with former Independent Prosecutor Kenneth Starr. Visitors like Starr or former Rep. Vin Weber often refer to themselves and their audiences as Republicans when they speak at the center. In December 1992, Star Tribune reporter Dane Smith wrote about a Weber speech at the center: "Rep. Vin Weber, one of the nation's foremost conservative Republican strategists, told a gathering of his comrades .... " The transcript of the event confirms Weber's introduction: "Let me talk a little bit about where I think we are as a movement, which is inextricably, in my mind -- not in the minds of everybody here, but in mine -- linked with where we are as a Republican Party." The Center has played host to many other Republican strategists, such as Marvin Olasky, the godfather of so-called compassionate conservatism, and David Horowitz, the lapsed leftist and now subsidized rightist, who runs a Web site called Political War that advises Republicans on how to win elections. Mainstream media outlets have reported that Republican George W. Bush is one of many Horowitz adherents, and Olasky himself is one of Bush's chief domestic-policy advisers. Here in Minnesota, the past three chairmen of the state Republican Party have been inextricably intertwined in the center's affairs. One, Chris Georgacas, directed the largest project in the center's history, the "Minnesota Policy Blueprint," a prescriptive book modeled on the Heritage Foundation's "Mandate for Leadership" series, that attempts to tell Minnesotans how their state should be run. The people and positions of the policy blueprint and those of the Minnesota Republican Party are virtually indistinguishable. In fact, the roster of people who wrote the blueprint reads like a list of the state Republican apparat. At least 44 of about 110 are either current or former Republican officeholders, current or former Republican office seekers, Republican bureaucrats (campaign chairmen, lawyers, etc.), or Republican financiers. All 19 committee heads, and the two directors of the project, were Republicans as well. Many others represent the traditional allies of Republicans, including representatives and lobbyists for organizations such as the Minnesota Business Partnership, Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Minnesota Association of Realtors and other captains of industry. Observers of the center may have noticed its close relations with Republicans. More revealing is its tight relationship to the broader national conservative movement. At the beginning of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Hillary Rodham Clinton charged that there was a "vast, right-wing conspiracy" against her husband. Her charge was wrong to one extent: The movement against her husband was not a conspiracy, because of that word's connotations of secrecy; rather, it is a social and economic movement, directed and funded on an ongoing basis by a small but wealthy group of individuals and philanthropies. It is a movement that the center is deeply involved in. The prime funders of this movement are the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation of Milwaukee, Wis.; the John M. Olin Foundation of New York; the Scaife foundations of Pittsburgh, Pa., and nine other right-wing foundations. Although the CAE has officially received only $175,000 from the Bradley and Olin foundations, it receives significantly more from the movement in the form of subsidized content for its presentations. A partial list of the foundation-subsidized speakers and players from the center reads like a Who's Who of America's conservative movement, and includes such familiar names as William Bennett, Robert Bork, William F. Buckley, Linda Chavez, Ward Connerly and Kenneth Starr. Some, like Bork, are on the permanent payroll of these foundations. Many times these people participate or speak at the center for a reduced fee, or for free, as was the case when the scientific racist Charles Murray, writer of the widely discredited tome, "The Bell Curve," came through town. Without the people, institutions and tax-exempt funding of the movement, the center's roster would be barren indeed. This sharing goes the other way, too. For example, the CAE has a sister institution called the Heartland Institute, another 501(c)(3), based in Chicago, which has its own periodical called Intellectual Ammunition. Last year, Intellectual Ammunition ran a cover story written by none other than the center's own Pearlstein, which was in turn a summation of the policy blueprint. This is one of many examples where CAE-produced content has appeared in publications produced by other members of the subsidized conservative movement. In fact, the movement has created some of its own institutions to aid in just this sort of coordination of everything from the actual giving of the philanthropies (the Philanthropy Roundtable) to the work of state and regional-based think tanks (the State Policy Network) to the work of the movement's legislators (the American Legislative Exchange Council). The "resources" page of the center's Web site lists much of the movement. There are too many disconcerting activities of the center, and the movement it is part of, to cover in one article. Cursor.org, the local media-criticism Web site I edit, has launched a new site, called Media Transparency (www.MediaTransparency.org), that attempts to document the grant making of the 12 largest conservative foundations, complete with articles about the recipient organizations and people, feature stories about topics contained in the grants, and links to other Web sites around the world that shed light on this movement. Media Transparency is in some sense a reaction to the Twin Cities media's passive and accepting treatment of the presentations of the center, its uncritical dissemination of CAE content and its failure to take a hard look at the center's activities. Just recently, for example, MPR broadcast an hourlong speech by Robert Novak, who gave advice to Republicans on how they can win the upcoming election. Last month, an experienced Star Tribune journalist allowed the subsidized conservative pundit William F. Buckley, who had been invited to speak at the center, to pour factually erroneous Republican hyperbole directly onto the news pages. My hope is that in the future, armed with the knowledge of what the center really is, the media of this town will be more vigilant and discerning about both the unmediated reproduction of its presentations and the overall coverage of its activities. At the very least, perhaps articles and broadcast reports about the center should contain the following tagline: The Center of the American Experiment is a 501(c)(3) organization, and as such is not legally allowed to intervene in political campaigns, nor underwrite the activities of a political party. sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.
|
MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCHBill Berkowitz PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism' On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.
Bill Berkowitz Neil Bush of Saudi ArabiaDuring recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy' In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."
Bill Berkowitz Newt Gingrich's back door to the White HouseAmerican Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.
Bill Berkowitz American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against IranDespite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.
Bill Berkowitz After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based InitiativeUnmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
Bill Berkowitz Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."
Bill Berkowitz Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouseFueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Bill Berkowitz Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihadFounder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."
Bill Berkowitz Tom Tancredo's missionThe Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.
Bill Berkowitz Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of ChurchesNew report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.
|
|||||||||||||||
Is the Center of the American Experiment for Republicans Only?
Printer friendly
