search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
October 27, 2005

Faith-Based Public Relations

Mike Paul, the president of MGP & Associates PR, claims that his public relations firm's philosophy 'is grounded in both business and biblical principles'

In this era when the George W. Bush Administration is putting its faith-based stamp on just about everything, leave it to an enterprising New Yorker to come up with a new way to feed at the new federal religious feeding trough.

Mike Paul claims that biblical precepts guide his public relations work. Paul, who runs the New York City-based MGP & Associates PR, was front and center -- publicizing and speaking -- at the "What is an Evangelical?" seminar held in New York in early September. The seminar was the fourth in an ongoing series specifically geared towards breaking down barriers between evangelicals and the media.

In light of the Rev. Pat Robertson's statements advocating the assassination of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez and comments by some evangelical leaders that Hurricane Katrina was God's judgment on New Orleans, the event was particularly timely. Co-hosted by the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), Christianity Today magazine, and the New York Divinity School, the seminars are media-only events geared toward educating radio, television and print media and dispelling stereotypes about evangelical Christians.

While seminar organizers didn't completely disassociate themselves from the Rev. Robertson or the Rev. Jerry Falwell, Bob Wenz, V.P. of National Ministries of the NAE, made it clear that while "They [Robertson and Falwell] are people who we love to work with ... we have a broader constituency than that."

"One of the key messages that will come out of this conference is that the evangelical community is not a monolith, no different from the black community, the white community, and the Hispanic community," Wenz said in a pre-seminar interview with the Christian Post.

"There has been an upset over the portrayal of evangelicals. Some stories are truly accurate and some truly stereotyped," Paul, a speaker at, and spokesperson for, the seminar told The Christian Post.

"If you're a Christian organization and you want to get stories placed on mainstream media consistently, you need to form a relationship, you need to think from their perspective, not just our own," Paul added. "It's a two-way street."

At the gathering at New York Divinity School in Times Square, Paul said that "Many evangelical organizations don't fully understand journalists and the challenging world of media, yet many still complain when they get horrible coverage, see stereotyped Christian perspectives in the news or no one knows who they truly are at all."

Whether Paul successfully gets a two-way "relationship" going with the press remains to be seen; an early October Nexis search didn't turn up any articles on the "What is an Evangelical?" seminar and a Google search found three, all from the aforementioned Christian Post.

Paul does more than attempt to bridge the evangelical/media gap. During an August 12, segment on Fox News Channel's "The O'Reilly Factor" he was introduced by guest host John Gibson as "a reputation management and public relations expert." Gibson asked Paul whether anti-war activist and mother of a killed soldier Cindy Sheehan would be hurt by "her alliance with anti-war groups," a story Fox was vigorously promoting.

Paul averred that the association would "hurt" Sheehan, "in the long run." The story, he said, would shift from Sheehan the grieving mother to Sheehan the anti-war activist, and "she can't wear two hats for long." On whether the president should meet with Sheehan, Paul felt that since they met once, another meeting would set a "precedent" for any grieving family and that would be "the wrong thing."

Then, Paul really got on message.

GIBSON: Wouldn't he actually score political points, instead of letting her make it appear that he's afraid to see her?

PAUL: The president has the ability to take it, as you say. He is a person who is caring, who can show that empathy.

But the bigger question is where do you stop? How many parents do you do this for? This war has others who have died. There are future people that will die. What type of precedent does that set for the president of the United States?

GIBSON: Well, what if it sets no precedent? Suppose it's just one? He says OK, there's political pressure. The anti-war types want me to face Cindy Sheehan. She symbolizes every other parent who's lost a child or a husband or a relative. That's the one I'm going to talk to.

PAUL: Well, the problem is she doesn't symbolize that. If she were a person who were out there by herself, who are - was grieving over a cross that was put out there initially, and it was only her who was grieving from a personal perspective for her son, then you're absolutely right. That would be the right person.

But that's not the situation now. This is an anti-war activist who is leading from that perspective right now. She has over 100 other people that are out there with her. She has ads that are being paid for by other liberal groups. And this is going to continue to go on.

She is the poster person now for the anti-war movement. She is not just a grieving mother. If she were only a grieving mother, then I would say yes, there's a possibility that that would happen, but his aides and his closest relations and consultants will tell him that this is a wrong thing for him to do.

Mike Paul is in the image-creating and image-reconstruction business; his firm works to create positive public perceptions for his clients and, when needed, he patches up mangled reputations. When a celebrity, sports star, religious or political leader, and/or business executive gets into trouble, Paul tries to get them started-up again.

Paul, who is Black, heads up MGP & Associates PR (website), a New York City-based public relations firm. Before setting up his own operation, he worked for two of the top PR firms in the world: He was a senior associate at Burson-Marsteller, and he was a vice president and senior counselor of Hill & Knowlton's New York Public Affairs Group. Paul also served in the administration of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani as executive vice president of communications, marketing and advertising for the New York City Economic Development Corp.

For the past 10 years, Paul has run MGP & Associates PR using the client-reassuring slogan, "Because Your Reputation is Everything." Paul also prides himself on running an operation that squares with Biblical principles. The company's website claims that its "philosophy is grounded in both business and biblical principles," and its staff make sure that "our ethical and moral standards are the highest in the industry."

MGP & Associates PR appears to see itself as a standard-bearer of morality and ethics for the public relations industry. Some might call that an oxymoron, given the sorry state of the industry these days. MGP & Associates PR may be setting the bar at a pretty low level. The company, however, insists that it is picky about the clients it chooses, and that its "founders prayerfully consider all decisions before they are made."

My Brief Chat with Mr. Paul

Media Transparency telephoned Mike Paul at his New York City offices to ask about work his company was doing for Bishop Harry Jackson and his High-Impact Leadership Coalition.

Bishop Jackson, the Black senior pastor of the 2,000-member Hope Christian Church in College Park, Maryland, has emerged as a national political figure this year. In January, when the formation of his High-Impact Leadership Coalition (HILC) was announced, a press release prepared by MGP & Associated PR described the group as a "grassroots nonprofit organization" whose "mission is to help educate and empower church, community and political leaders in urban communities across America regarding moral value issues important to us all, especially among African Americans."

A paragraph at the tail end of the release advised those "interested in attending the summit" in Los Angeles where the HILC's plans were to be formerly unveiled to call Mike Paul. By contacting Paul, inquiring minds could learn more about the Black Contract with America on Moral Values, or interview Bishop Harry Jackson.

In mid-August, during an event called "Justice Sunday II - God Save the United States and This Honorable Court!" at the Two Rivers Baptist Church in Nashville, Tennessee -- a live nationwide television simulcast produced by Family Research Council and Focus on the Family Action -- Bishop Jackson was the only Black speaker to address the crowd.

Bishop Jackson's work with MGP is interesting because of the increased attention paid to Black leaders, particularly Black religious leaders, by the Republican Party, and his emergence as a national spokesperson for so-called traditional family values.

Over the years, I have spoken with conservative leaders, Bush Administration officials and staff members of various right wing organizations. I have been impressed by the courtesy with which they dealt with my inquiries, their willingness to respond forthrightly, and, when they did not have the information I needed or did not particularly want to comment on an question, they would come out and say so without equivocation.

My conversation with Mike Paul, conversely, was brief. I identified myself as a columnist with Working Assets' WorkingForChange.com. I then asked him about what work his firm was doing for the High-Impact Leadership Coalition.

Paul said that he was doing "national public relations." I asked what that entailed. Instead of answering the question, he asked me again who I was writing for. I said I was a columnist with WorkingForChange.com, an Internet site run by Working Assets, the socially responsible alternative telephone company.

He then said, "Look, I'm in a car trying to help out a liberal rag. I deal with big media outlets, and your rag is probably seen by only a handful of people. This phone call is done. I gave you my answer. Have a good day."

Paul's Faith-Based Approach to Public Relations

In December 2004, in an article about the growing influence of Christian faith in the workplace, Mike Paul told PR Week's Keith O'Brien that his "faith is extremely important, and it is a part of who I am, as a being."

Paul became a born-again Christian in 1997, a "development [that] touched all parts of his life," O'Brien wrote.

While MGP is "not at a Christian PR firm, and Paul takes on many secular clients," his firm's Christian clients include Young Life, a global Christian organization; Concerts of Prayer of Greater New York; and Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr., "who Paul says was pushing moral values during the election season," and the City Covenant Coalition.

According to its website, the Brooklyn, New York-based City Covenant Coalition "is a Coalition of 'ascension gift' ministers and ministries that come together in covenant to transform cities and impact the nations with the 'gospel of the Kingdom of God.'" Joseph Mattera, the director of the City Covenant Coalition (CCC), is a major player in New York City's so-called defense of marriage movement, and an outspoken opponent of same-sex marriage. Paul's firm did the press work for the "The 'Defense of Marriage' Press Conference," organized by the CCC and held at New York City's City Hall on March 29, 2004.

Christians should bring their faith to the workplace Paul told PR Week's O'Brien. But different people take different approaches to "letting that shine through." Paul said that, "I won't necessarily do that with a Wall Street firm, political leader, or professional athlete, but they will all know within a week of hiring me that my faith is an important part of my life."

According to O'Brien, Paul said that some of his secular clients refer to him as a "choirboy" in their first encounters. "But guess what?" Paul asks. "It's the choirboy you want to help you when you're in the midst of hell."

O'Brien reported that Paul claims that he "strives to be an example about truth, humility, accountably and transparency": "Ironically this is very much a perfect fit towards what we should do in the business," Paul said.

He does not have a problem with taking on an "unethical client."

"If a client was unethical, and [wants to] come back to the truth, then I want to help them," Paul told O'Brien. "If [he or she] is looking for someone to spin something, my firm is not the answer. I don't have a problem walking away from a situation that I know is wrong."

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >