Regular html version with links
Bill Berkowitz
August 18, 2005
What do New York’s Democratic Senator, Hillary Clinton, New Mexico’s Democratic Governor, Bill Richardson, the only Hispanic governor in the country, and the Center for the Study of Popular Culture’s (CSPC) David Horowitz have in common?
The answer: the politics of immigration.
According to John Fund, writing in his Wall Street Journal column on Monday, August 15, 2005, Governor Richardson recently declared a “’state of emergency’ in four New Mexico border counties due to "a chaotic situation involving illegal alien smuggling and illegal drug shipments." The governor is also “pledg[ing] $1.5 million for stepped-up law enforcement and also asked Chris Simcox, the president of the volunteer border patrol group Minutemen, for a meeting.” According to Media Matters, however, "Richardson ... dismissed Fund's claim as a 'total fabrication,' and Simcox himself refuted Fund, stating it was the Minutemen who reached out to Richardson -- not the other way around."
Senator Clinton recently “made headlines when she embraced high-tech measures to control the border with Mexico and fines for employers who hire illegal aliens,” Fund writes.
While Governor Richardson and Senator Clinton may be seeking to get on board the immigration-issue train as they begin their long trek toward the Democratic Party convention in 2008, David Horowitz, it appears, is looking for another wedge issue to fulfill his ideological and fundraising needs.
Although it’s doubtful that Horowitz will take up a post at the US / Mexico or US / Canada border anytime soon -- as the Minuteman Project is proposing for October -- he apparently feels that he is well enough on his way to cleansing America’s colleges and universities of anti-patriotic liberal academics to test the roiling waters of immigration politics.
To that end, on Friday, August 26, the Center for the Study of Popular Culture (CSPS - website) is co-sponsoring, along with the Washington DC-based Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR - website) and the Coalition for Immigration Reform of California, a daylong conference on immigration at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.
The conference, which “will focus on the impact of Illegal Immigration on America relating to issues of: national security, the economy, society and politics,” has an all-star line-up that includes:
The Wall Street Journal’s John Fund believes that President Bush is “vulnerable on immigration,” and that Governor Richardson and Senator Clinton could seize control of the issue.
Fund charged Clinton with wanting “to have it both ways” on the issue of immigration: “Despite her noises about beefing up enforcement, she did not talk about immigration, temporary-worker programs or border enforcement when she addressed the National Council of La Raza, the largest Hispanic civil rights group in the country."
According to Fund, Clinton “pandered to the liberal crowd and received a standing ovation when she announced a new bill that would guarantee in-state college tuition rates for the children of illegal immigrants as well as amnesty to some 65,000 illegal immigrant students who graduate from U.S. high schools each year.”
Clinton “won 85% of the Hispanic vote in New York for Senate in 2000," said former adviser turned adversary Dick Morris. "She thinks she can outbid the Republicans for Hispanic votes in 2008 while bringing Reagan Democrats home with vague rhetoric about getting tough and employer sanctions she has no intention of implementing."
“In New Mexico,” Fund wrote, “Governor Richardson ... blasts the federal government for not showing ‘the commitment or the leadership to deal with border issues’ ... [and at the same time] is demanding that officials on the Mexican side bulldoze an abandoned town on the border that serves ‘as a staging area for illegal drugs and illegal aliens.’” According to Fund, Richardson has reversed his position on these issues from as recently as late 2003, “when he showed up at a rally for the ‘Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride’ and told them, ‘Viva la raza! Thank you for coming to Santa Fe. Know that New Mexico is your home. We will protect you. You have rights here."
"Democrats clearly sense frustration on immigration among Bush's base voters and are trying to outflank him rhetorically on the right," Martha Montelongo, a talk-show hostess in California, told Fund.
Attitudes on immigration among neoconservatives and Jews appear to be changing dramatically, Tom Barry, the policy director of the International Relations Center (website), recently wrote in a piece for Inter Press Service:
Before the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the neo-conservative political camp and U.S. Jews were dependable allies against the restrictionist immigration policies of such organizations as the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
Today, however, neocon institutes and synagogues are increasingly the forums for the type of nationalist immigration policies that were previously regarded as emblematic of the populist right-wing and the paleoconservatives in the United States.
Barry pointed out that the Center for Immigration Studies’ Mark Krikorian, a speaker at the CSPC conference, is ”the most high-profile lobbyist for restrictionist legislation,” and that he is happy to see “such leading neoconservatives as Daniel Pipes, director of the pro-Likud Middle East Forum, are now regularly raising alarms about immigration.
Shortly after 9/11, Krikorian’s CIS colleague, Stephen Steinlight, who used to be national affairs director for the pro-immigration American Jewish Committee and its representative in the pro-immigration National Immigration Forum, wrote, “We should give serious, immediate consideration to terminating our alliance with the advocates of open borders -- we do not belong in their coalitions.”
Ira Mehlman, another conference attendee said recently that ”American Jews need to look out for their own self-interest,” including the diverse threats from Muslim and Latino immigration.
”This is not about right-left politics,” said Mehlman, but ”about excessive numbers of immigrants coming here and placing a burden on our communities, our schools, and our economy.”
Barry concluded that, “The broadening anti-immigration coalition is yet another sign that the new intensity of the immigration debate is not so much a factor of macroeconomic cycles ... [but] is more a product of the politics of fear and nationalism now sweeping the United States, and a dimension of the cultural wars that are increasingly dividing the country and pitting the U.S. against foreign societies and nations.”
“I don’t recall Horowitz’s name popping up before around immigration issues,” Devin Burghart, who monitors anti-immigrant movements with the Illinois-based human rights group, the Center for New Community's Building Democracy Initiative, told Media Transparency in a telephone interview. “And he is politically savvy and smart enough to know that immigration is the hottest issue inside the GOP these days.”
Bush’s immigration plan appears to be going nowhere in Congress so “I think we’ll see a lot more opportunists like Horowitz stepping forward and trying to grab hold of the issue as time goes by,” Burghart added.