search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

MEDIA TRANSPARENCY

Newsletter

Sign-up for our newsletter

Register

Only registered visitors are allowed to email content or post comments

Support Media Transparency

Your help is essential to this website

AROUND THE WEB | pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Working for Change
August 23, 2001
Bill Berkowitz

Voucherizing Bush's faith-based initiative

Conservative ideologue Marvin Olasky - the so-called "godfather of compassionate conservatism" - has revealed a duplicitous bait-and-switch political tactic employed by the Republican Bush White House to get its faith-based initiative off the ground.

Writing in the Christian magazine he edits called "World", Olasky called the dust-up over the Salvation Army's request to spend federal money in discriminatory ways a "feint":

"The biggest feint of all, according to one executive close to the White House, has been the entire debate over separating 'religious' and 'nonreligious' content [of the recipient agency's programs]. 'Let people fight over that. It's all a show,' he said. 'We kick and scream. We didn't roll over too easy on language, or else they'll think it's what you wanted.' What's truly important in the legislation, he said, is a 'stealth provision' about vouchers: 'Let people argue over grants, but get the vouchers passed.'"

According to Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Bush administration sources told Olasky that from the very beginning, they were confident that Department of Justice senior counsel Carl Esbeck who "is a master at writing vague language," would create an opening for proselytizing despite what appears to be restrictions against it.

And that came to pass. Folded into the House bill is a "stealth provision" using a system of vouchers to allow faith-based organizations to get around the no proselytizing restrictions. In "Vouchers, Faith-Based Initiative's Saving Grace," an article posted on the Web site of the Center for the Study of Compassionate Conservatism, Michael Barkey describes vouchers as the "Faith-Based Initiative's saving grace."

Barkey, president of the recently founded Center for which Olasky serves on its Board of Directors, describes the provision: "Like food stamps, vouchers can be issued directly to individuals who may then redeem them for goods and services at the qualifying institution of their choice. Vouchers maintain a wall of separation between the government and the service provider, reducing the likelihood of organizational dependency or regulatory creep. And the government doesn't support any particular religion through a voucher plan, only enable individuals to choose where to go for assistance."

Barkey also points out that the House bill allows for cabinet secretaries "to convert 'some or all of the funds' earmarked for social service spending under the charitable choice provision of the 1996 welfare reform law ($47 billion annually), into 'indirect assistance,' that is into vouchers."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
August 17, 2001

"The departure of John DiIulio means George Bush officially becomes the president of white America"

John DiIulio resigns as head of Faith Based Initiative

John DiIulio is resigning as head of the Bush Administration's so-called Faith Based Initiative (FBI). The Washington Post reports that:

...DiIulio's allies charged that the resignation meant the White House's faith initiative...had been taken over by religious conservatives.

"The departure of John DiIulio means George Bush officially becomes the president of white America," said the Rev. Eugene Rivers, a black minister who appeared with Bush in Austin and Washington as a vigorous backer of the effort. "The message in Professor DiIulio's departure is that the black and the poor in the inner cities can go to hell. It sends a signal that the faith-based office will just be a financial watering hole for the right-wing white evangelists."

Of course, why anybody should believe anything that DiIulio says is itself in question. Besides being on the payroll of the conservative philanthropies, his previous research and writings have proven to be spectacularly wrong. The 1996 book that he co-wrote with fellow sponsored conservatives William J. Bennett and John Walters that warned of a coming wave of teenage "superpredators" led to a nationwide wave of teenage imprisonment and prison building - yet the predicted sociatal change never occured - a concept which, according to the New York Times he now "regrets" promoting.

Also see:

Grants to "DiIulio"

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

MSNBC
August 6, 2001

Faith Based Bilking

A new report details how a deep desire to make money combined with deep religous faith makes many Americans easy prey for religious-based scams. Conservative philanthropy funded propagandists have helped fuel this environment by arguing that Wealth Creation is somehow a path to salvation.

The report on MSNBC details how some 90,000 religious Americans have been bilked out of nearly $2 billion over the past three years by con artists who "tap into the accepting and often non-questioning pockets of religious-minded people...promising unearthly rewards from divinely blessed investment..."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
July 10, 2001

Bush Drops Rule On Hiring of Gays

Democrats: 'Faith-Based' Initiative at Risk

One day after the Washington Post broke a story about how the Salvation Army had worked out a secret deal with the Republican Bush Administration that would have allowed them to discriminate against Gays - in exchange for them supporting the administration's so-called "Faithbased Initiative" and undertaking a $100,000 publicity campaign for it, the Bush Administration said yesterday that it "will not pursue the [Office of Management and Budget] regulation proposed by the Salvation Army and reported today."

The update also points out how the Salvation Army is technically a church, and already receives $300 million per year from government.

Also see:

NY Times: Charity Is Told It Must Abide by Antidiscrimination Laws

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Daily News
July 10, 2001
Pete Hamill

DON'T SEND A GOD TO DO A GOVERNMENT'S JOB

Protesters greet Bush in New York

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
July 9, 2001

Charity Cites Bush Help in Fight Against Hiring Gays

Salvation Army Wants Exemption From Laws

The Bush administration is working with the nation's largest charity, the Salvation Army [Which - the report makes clear - already receives $300 million per year in government money], to make it easier for government-funded religious groups to practice hiring discrimination against gay people, according to an internal Salvation Army document.

...The report also offers an image of the Salvation Army starkly different from that of volunteers ringing bells outside shopping malls at Christmas -- a notion that concerns the charity. "The Salvation Army's role will be a surprise to many in the media," it says, urging efforts to "minimize the possibility of any 'leak' to the media."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

MediaTransparency.org
June 20, 2001
Dennis Redovich

Nobel Prizes Show U.S. Science Education Is World’s Best

Disputes conservatives' contention about the quality of US Public Education by Dennis Redovich

According to an analysis of Nobel prizes awarded in science over the past century, the United States leads the world in technology and in the quality of its scientists.

According to an analysis of Nobel prizes awarded in science over the past century, the United States leads the world in technology and in the quality of its scientists.

Paradoxically, the general news media, and the experts it chooses to quote, frequently state the following two seemingly mutually exclusive ideas about the US educational system:

1. American elementary and secondary education is not competitive with and on average is below the level of education in other countries, particularly in science and mathematics.

2. The quality of American colleges and universities is generally considered to be exalted in the world of postsecondary education.

How could both of these statements be correct? The answer is: they aren't. The first statement is absolute nonsense and the second is absolutely true.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
June 2, 2001

A LOOK AT . . . JUDICIAL AGENDAS & THE FEDERALISTS

Dinh Plays Dumb

Several Bush administration judicial nominees belong to the 25,000-member Federalist Society. During law professor Viet Dinh's May confirmation hearing to be an assistant attorney general, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) questioned him about the organization's legal philosophy. Excerpts:

DURBIN: So it is your belief that the Federalist Society does not have a . . . stated philosophy when it comes to, for example, the future course of the Supreme Court?

DINH: No, I do not think it does have a stated philosophy...

DURBIN: Where would you put the Federalist Society on the political spectrum?

DINH: You know, I simply do not know...

DURBIN: Well, let me say that what I've read -- and I'm not an expert nor am I a member of the Federalist Society -- they do have a very conservative philosophy. I don't think they are a debating society. I think they have an agenda.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Salon.com
May 22, 2001

The Arkansas Project wasn't journalism

Ted Olson's defenders say the Clinton-bashing effort was protected by the First Amendment -- and besides, Olson didn't know much about it anyway. They're wrong on both counts.

...In short, the Arkansas Project was a dirty-tricks operation more than a journalistic investigation. It's easy to understand why an attorney of Ted Olson's great reputation would rather say he had no connection with such unsavory people and practices. But is he telling the truth?

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
May 20, 2001

Movement Seeks to Invalidate Affirmate Action Once and For All: Through the Supreme Court

A movement funded and created charity called the Center for Individual Rights, after having led successful fights to invalidate affirmative action at public universities from Texas to California to Michigan, is now seeking to eradicate affirmative action in all higher education, by bringing a case to the US Supreme Court, where it is sure to get a friendly hearing from the Republican majority.

One of the Center's victorious lawyers, Republican Solicitor General nominee Theodore Olson, would actually represent the government in such a lawsuit should he be confirmed. In such a case, Olson has said he may recuse himself.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Salon.com
May 16, 2001

Arkansas Project Coverup

Smearing David Brock

Ted Olson's defenders say that former right-wing journalist David Brock had nothing to do with the Arkansas Project. But the project's own records prove they're wrong.

Conservative writer David Brock received nearly $40,000 from the American Spectator's Arkansas Project, project records show, despite claims by Spectator editors that Brock had nothing to do with the controversial Clinton-bashing project.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
May 16, 2001
William Safire

Coverup Picks Up Steam

In an Op-Ed accusing Senate Democrats of violating the first amendment by pursuing Republican/Conservative Movement Lawyer Theodore Olson's lies about his work for the American Spectator, columnist and former Republican speechwriter William Safire equates political hit men working with tax-exempt monies to journalists.

Read Safire's column. It is an excellent example of how Republicans within the mainstream press echo and reinforce the Republican/Conservative movement line using tactics like obfuscation and irrelevant comparisons.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Salon.com
May 15, 2001

Potential Bombshell:

Did Movement Lawyer Theodore Olson, Nominated Now for Socilitor General, Engineer a Coverup of Richard Scaife's Notorious Arkansas Project?

"In perhaps the summary's most controversial allegation, Brock [David, former writer 'hit man' for the Spectator, in a an interview with congressional Democratic staff] is said to have "suggested that Mr. Olson helped 'engineer' the firing of the Spectator's original publisher, Ronald Burr, who urged an open investigation of payments to David Hale." According to the summary, Brock told Democratic staffers that the credibility of Hale, represented by Olson and the key witness against the Clintons in the Whitewater investigation, would have been damaged if it had been revealed that he received money from the Arkansas Project."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
April 23, 2001

Federalist Society handpicks many Federal Judgeship Candidates

The New York Times reported today (April 24, 2001) that "Of the 70 candidates [for federal judgeships] interviewed so far by the White House, officials said 17 to 20 had been recommended directly by the Federalist Society's Washington headquarters."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

The Nation
April 15, 2001

Here Come the Judges

All signs point to an all-out drive by the Bush Administration to slot judicial conservatives into the eighty-nine current vacancies on the federal bench...

The Bushites' court-packing drive is a grade-A rush job. For one thing, the roll Bush is on is petering out with his tax plan seen by a wider public as too friendly to the rich. Then, too, if an enfeebled Strom Thurmond exits the stage, control of the Judiciary Committee would shift to the Democrats, and then it's a whole new ball game

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Monthly
March 31, 2001

Utah: Where Church Meets State

Is This Our Faith-Based Future?

...If you have lived, as I have, as a non-Mormon in a place whose population is 70 percent LDS, you would understand the real dangers in mixing too much church with state. I was born and raised in Utah, and my entire family still lives there. Every time I go back, from the minute I wade past the missionaries in the Salt Lake City airport to my first watered-down beer, I am struck by the fact that, while inmates may be able to duck Chuck Colson, the average Utah citizen has no hope of escaping the Mormons...

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
March 30, 2001

In New York City barbarians Edison turned back at the gate

As Bid to Privatize Schools Ends, Supporters Second-Guess Effort

...local Democratic politicians rained scorn on a Board of Education proposal to allow a private company, Edison Schools, to manage five troubled public schools...

The speakers evoked the wounds of past discrimination, of the board's neglect of their schools, of the divisive decentralization battles of the 1960's, and of programs imposed by a Republican mayor and central school board that are deeply mistrusted in many of the affected communities...

Edison representatives and board officials listened in shock...

The opposition to Edison... was vigorous and highly organized. Opponents believed they faced a corporate beachhead into the domain they had shaped over decades. Publicly, they said schoolchildren were being reduced to dollar signs, while privately they feared an erosion of their power throughout the school system.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
March 16, 2001

Bush Would Sever Law Group's Role in Screening Judges

President Bush's legal advisers have told the American Bar Association that they want to end the group's nearly half-century role as a semiofficial screening panel for judicial nominees, lawyers involved in the discussions said today.

The lawyers said they believed that the proposal reflected the administration's desire to shift the courts in a conservative direction and to satisfy many conservative Republicans who have long complained that the bar association has displayed a liberal bias in evaluating prospective federal judges.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
March 10, 2001

They're Everywhere, They're Everywhere!

Republicans, Federalists, Move Quickly to Fill Judicial Slots Boycotted by Senate Republicans

After the Republican-controlled senate held up scores of Clinton Administration judicial appointments, the new Bush Administration is rushing to fill vacancies on the federal bench. The New York Times reported, unsurprisingly, that the tax-exempt charity the Federalist Society, whose influence is pervasive in the federal court system, is once again heavily involved in the candidate selection and preparation.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Mother Jones
March 4, 2001

Privatization of Education Will Benefit Big Bush Donors

...Just as brokers stand to benefit from privatizing Social Security, some of Bush's largest donors would profit from turning education over to the marketplace.

Two of the largest backers of Edison Schools, the nation's largest private manager of public schools, contributed heavily to the Republicans. John Childs (No. 17), a Boston financier, gave $670,000, and Donald Fisher (No. 184), chairman of the Gap, gave $260,800, all but $62,800 to the GOP. Investors in Advantage Schools, one of Edison's chief competitors, also backed the GOP. John Hennessy (No. 362), whose Credit Suisse First Boston has pumped $19 million into Advantage, took a lead fundraising role for Bush and contributed $164,000 of his own money to the Republicans. John Doerr (No. 55, $477,500) and Kevin Compton of the Silicon Valley venture firm Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers, which has invested in Advantage, also ventured into politics. Compton gave $143,000 to Republicans, while Doerr supported Gore, who promoted a charter school plan of his own...

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
March 2, 2001
Supreme Court Watch

The Supreme Court v. Balance of Powers

The current Supreme Court has a definite political agenda - one devoted chiefly to reallocating governmental power in ways that suit the views of its conservative majority...

The court's recent decision in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, which ruled that state employees may not sue their states under the Americans With Disabilities Act, is but the latest example of the court's assertion of the primacy of its views over those of Congress...

For nearly a decade, the court's five conservative justices have steadily usurped the power to govern by striking down or weakening federal and state laws regulating issues as varied as gun sales, the environment and patents - as well as laws protecting women and now the disabled. Not in every situation, of course, but the general blueprint is unmistakable. Rather than serving to chasten the conservative court, the experience of deciding Bush v. Gore may have further emboldened it.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Monthly
February 28, 2001
Jamin Raskin

Bandits in Black Robes

Why you should still be angry about Bush v. Gore

Quite demonstrably the worst Supreme Court decision in history, Bush v. Gore changes everything in American law and politics. The Rehnquist Court has destroyed any moral prestige still lingering from the Warren Court's brief but passionate commitment to civil rights in the middle of the last century. Now the court has returned to its historic conservative role, rushing to aid the political party of property and race privilege in a debased partisan way, torturing out of the Equal Protection Clause new rules to assure the power of one political faction. Bush v. Gore was no momentary lapse of judgment by five conservative justices, but the logical culmination of their long drive to define an extra-constitutional natural law enshrining the rights of white electoral majorities, like the one that brought George W. Bush the White House.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
February 26, 2001

Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down Appellate Court Ruling in American Trucking

Huge Loss For Conservative Movement; Victory for EPA

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the way the federal government sets clean-air standards, rejecting industry arguments that officials must balance compliance costs against the health benefits of cleaner air.

The unanimous ruling, a major boost for the federal Clean Air Act, said the law does not require the government to consider the financial cost of reducing harmful emissions when it sets air-quality standards.

The justices also ruled against industry arguments that the Environmental Protection Agency took too much lawmaking power from Congress when it set tougher standards for ozone and soot in 1997.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

The Nation
February 4, 2001
Vincent Bugliosi

None Dare Call it Treason

In the December 12 ruling by the US Supreme Court handing the election to George Bush, the Court committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law...

...That an election for an American President can be stolen by the highest court in the land under the deliberate pretext of an inapplicable constitutional provision has got to be one of the most frightening and dangerous events ever to have occurred in this country. Until this act--which is treasonous, though again not technically, in its sweeping implications--is somehow rectified (and I do not know how this can be done), can we be serene about continuing to place the adjective "great" before the name of this country?

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

American Prospect
January 31, 2001

The Chicago Acid Bath

The Impoverished Logic of "Law and Economics"

Read about the cruel, market-serving, people-denying, "hyper-rational" legal theory called “Law and Economics,” funded by the conservative philanthropies, that is helping to transform American law by elevating the idea of “wealth-maximization” to the goal of the law.

Also see:

TripsForJudges.org

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Salon.com
January 31, 2001

Bringing faith to the West Wing

John DiIulio, who once spread fear about juvenile "superpredators," will now run President Bush's faith-based charity programs...the greatest impact of which will be to lay the groundwork for a national GOP patronage machine to rival the old days of Richard Daley and Boss Tweed...the damage [from his previous failure of vision] came because DiIulio -- judging from his subsequent regret -- failed to see the cynical political uses to which his research...would be put. The same...is true of his new elevation to the White House. DiIulio wants to promote good works. Instead, he's been hired as chief engineer for a patronage machine.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
December 12, 2000
Paul Krugman

In the Tank?

Even cynics were a bit startled by the revelation that Justice Clarence Thomas's wife has been employed by the Heritage Foundation to gather résumés for potential appointments in the next administration. But let me leave ethical issues to the experts and focus on a different question suggested by the story: To what extent will a Bush administration, if that's what we're about to have, be staffed by people from Heritage and its sister institutions? Are we about to enter an era of government by professional ideologues?

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
November 12, 2000

Vouchers Suffer Electoral Blow

In a public rebuke of the unprecedented funding that both conseravative philanthropies and fabulously wealthy individuals have made to push the policy of public school privatization upon the nation, voters in California and Michigan delivered a stern, anti-voucher message on Tuesday. The issue itself might now be dead, except for the conservative money and apparat fighting against public school teacher unions

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

Washington Post
September 30, 2000

School Choice Fallacies

Recently a full-page ad appeared in the New York Times sponsored by something called the Campaign for America's Children, which made it appear that public education in this country is a wreck. The solution, according to the group, is greater parental choice. "Every year we pump more money into our public education system, and every year the system gets worse," the ad says.

Several things are wrong with this story.... It's simply not true that funding for public schools has been steadily rising while schools get steadily worse. It's a slander to say that 90 percent of our kids (those who don't attend private schools) are "trapped in a failing system."

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

New York Times
August 27, 2000
Abner Mikva

The Wooing of Our Judges

Abner Mikva decries the "Educating" of federal judges at posh resorts by conservative foundations:

"...judges listened to speakers whose overwhelming message was that regulation should be limited -- that the free market should be relied upon to protect the environment, for example, or that the "takings" clause of the Constitution should be interpreted to prohibit rules against development in environmentally sensitive places.

[ link ] Read the story >

divider

pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21