search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

RELATED LINKS

Internal Links

Grants to:

Grants to Ronald Radosh
Center for the Study of Popular Culture
Encounter for Culture and Education

Profiles:

The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
Profile of Person David Horowitz
Profile of Person Peter Collier
Center for the Study of Popular Culture
Encounter for Culture and Education

External Links

Center for the Study of Popular Culture website

ColemanHoax.com

CSPC's Frontpage Magazine website

Encounter Books' website

Friends of Judi Bari website

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
February 6, 2005

Mangled History

Kate Coleman and Encounter Books' not so secret take down of Judi Bari, Earth First!, and the 'dead-enders' of the environmental movement

Kate Coleman expects her book on Judi Bari and Earth First! to be taken seriously. After all, she has a grand story to tell about some of the leading figures in Northern California's environmental wars that have pitted hard-scrabble, politically savvy and under-funded environmental activists against the Goliath's of the timber industry. But too many things in the book go wrong: she plays way too fast and loose with the facts -- and is accused of hundreds of errors, distortions and misstatement; her tone is mean-spirited and derogatory, showing little empathy or respect for the real life characters in her story; and, the book appears to be more about advancing the publisher's anti-environmental agenda than about the life of Judi Bari and the activities of Earth First!

Granted, an author doesn't always have the luxury of choosing her publisher, and in this case, Encounter Books (website), the San Francisco-based outfit headed by Peter Collier, chose Kate Coleman. Collier, a former lefty who turned to the right in the mid 1980s along with his more ubiquitous longtime writing partner David Horowitz, doesn't do things haphazardly. He must have had a pretty good idea of what he was going to get when he signed Coleman on.

In the end, The Secret Wars of Judi Bari: A Car Bomb, the Fight for the Redwoods, and the End of Earth First! published earlier this year by Encounter Books, tends to reveal more about Kate Coleman than about Judi Bari, Earth First!, the logging industry or the environmental movement.

+++++

On May 24, 1990, Judi Bari, a longtime labor and environmental activist, was nearly killed when a pipe bomb exploded in her Subaru station wagon while she and fellow Earth First! activist, Darryl Cherney, were traveling through Oakland, California. Bari, who was seriously injured, and Cherney, who was also hurt, were taken to Oakland's Highland Hospital.

There the two were questioned and arrested by the Oakland Police Department (OPD). The OPD theorized that Bari and Cherney had unintentionally bombed themselves while transporting the bomb to sabotage power lines. Later, the Alameda County district attorney would drop charges against the pair for lack of evidence.

Judi Bari died of cancer in 1997.

In 2002, the FBI and the Oakland Police Department were found liable for violating the constitutional rights of Bari and Cherney. Last year a settlement was reached which awarded $4 million to be divided, after considerable legal fees, between Bari's estate and Cherney.

+++++

Coleman's publisher, Encounter Books, run by Peter Collier, has a major league conservative political agenda. The San Francisco-based outfit is virtually a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Milwaukee, Wisconsin based Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, a right wing foundation supporting the work of conservative think tanks, policy centers and media outlets. According to Media Transparency, a website tracking "The Money Behind Conservative Media," between 1998 and 2002, the publisher received more than $4.5 million from Bradley with most of the grants earmarked "to assist the in the creation of" and "support [for] an education book project".

Encounter has published a number of books attacking liberals -- The Hillary Trap and The World According to Gore by Debra Saunders -- and leftists -- The Anti-Chomsky Reader, edited by both Collier and Horowitz, and Commies: A Journey Through the Old Left, the New Left and the Leftover Left by Ronald Radosh.

Collier is a longtime colleague of Horowitz, who currently heads up the Los Angeles-based Center for the Study of Popular Culture (website), an organization that since 1989 has received more than $13 million in right wing foundation money. As lefties, they co-edited Ramparts magazine in the sixties. Later, they collaborated on several biographies of famous American families, including The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty, The Kennedys: An American Drama, and The Fords: An American Epic and their 1989 book, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts about the Sixties.

In the 1980s, Collier and Horowitz abandoned the left for far more lucrative careers on the right. In a dramatic ideological reversal, they came out as Reagan Republicans in a 1985 Washington Post article called "Lefties for Reagan".

Coleman considers herself on the left side of the political spectrum. She recently told the San Francisco Chronicle's Edward Guthman that she supported affirmative action and backed John Kerry. According to Coleman, Collier approached her to write the Bari biography. She denied, however, that he tried to influence how she would tell the story. She does have a history, however, of writing articles "exposing" the failings and foolishness of the left. In 1978, she wrote a lengthy expose of the Black Panther Party and its leader, Huey Newton in New Times. Her writings including "The Last Panther," (July 1, 1997) and "The Panthers for Real" (June 23, 2003), have appeared on Horowitz's FrontPage Magazine website (website), and have been cited regularly by Horowitz. Her work has also been published in Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Shortly after the book was released, Bari's ex-husband, Mike Sweeney, set up a website, ColemanHoax.com, which lists 351 errors and falsehoods contained in the 232-page book. Click here for the entire list; also see "Coleman's top 26 lies,"; and Sweeney's "Instant Proof" feature where "With a click of the mouse," you can "see for yourself if Coleman's statements are true." Unfortunately, like the book, Sweeney's Web site doesn't spare the vitriol.

In early January, Friends of Judi Bari (FOJB) (website) was established "to defend Judi and her legacy from attacks by Big Timber, the FBI, the right-wing and their paid character assassins."

In Coleman's conversation with the Guthman, she takes little responsibility for the errors claiming that they will be corrected in subsequent editions. In the Chronicle story, headlined "Is the biographer of activist Judi Bari a tool of the right -- or just a skeptical liberal?," Coleman blamed the errors on being rushed to deadline; on fact checkers asleep at the wheel; and on Bari's cronies for denying her personal interviews and access: "I hold the Bari-ites and some of Bari's family responsible for censorship, for conspiring to keep certain biographical facts from me, then to turn around and criticize me exactly for not coming up with the very facts that they were responsible for withholding." (If only half of the errors/distortions/lies are corrected, it will still be a monumental task for Coleman, requiring her to practically rewrite the entire text.)

"In the end" writes columnist Chris Coursey of The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa, CA), "Coleman's book is ripe for comparison with the original investigation of the car bombing. The cops focused on Bari and...Cherney, as suspects in the bombing, then dropped the case when the facts didn't fit their theory. Coleman focuses on Sweeney, then concludes, "there was never any evidence against Sweeney that would pass muster in any court of law" ("Another Bari investigation falls short").

Some of Coleman's public appearances have turned into mini episodes of Crossfire, with Bari's comrades and Coleman's supporters locking horns. Responding to Guthman's questions about criticism from pro-Bari folks, Coleman said: "They don't know whom they are talking to. They're furious about (my) smearing Our Lady of the Forest -- Judi. And they're furious 'cause I said 'The End of Earth First' in the subtitle." She added, "They're not talking ideas. They have nothing that they're doing that's building a movement. These are dead-enders. The only way they have a forum is to attack me."

("Dead-enders" is a term that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld used to describe the insurgents during the early days of the occupation of Iraq.)

The book has stirred up a predictable hornet's nest. As of early February, the hornets were furiously buzzing around at the Web site of Amazon Books, where the 15 reviewers were nearly evenly split -- some think the book is a "smear job" that is "fraught with errors." Others argue that the book "offers insight into both Bari's followers as well as her personal life," and is "a rich and complete evaluation" of her life and times. Overall, the book earns three of five stars from reviewers.

+++++

I never knew Judi Bari. I met her once when she and her lawyer visited the DataCenter -- an Oakland-based research center I worked at for 25 years -- and gave a brief talk to the staff over lunch.

I don't know Kate Coleman. I met her once a few years ago during a walking tour of places related to the Free Speech Movement at the University of California, Berkeley.

And, I don't know much about Larry Lee, the man to whom Coleman dedicates the book. Lee was a highly respected newsman, reporter and radio pioneer and driving force behind the development of community radio.

What would Larry Lee say about this book?

If you are inclined to read Coleman's book be forewarned, and be sure to use the citations at ColemanHoax.com as a companion reader to better enable you to discern fact from fiction.

Susan Faludi, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of "Backlash" and "Stiffed" is also writing a book about Judi Bari, which will be released next year. Hopefully, Faludi will do a better job of getting the story straight. Given Encounter Books' anti-progressive and anti-environmental mission and record, one can't help but wonder whether journalistic standards were pushed aside in the rush to publish a pre-emptive strike against Faludi's work.

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >